Did the original myths about the universe evolve the human mind initially?

Question

Maybe we just need new myths.

I like alot of the extra terrestrial myths actually. ;)

Makes me feel like a distant future we could be knowingly or unknowingly working towards.

Answer 1

Some have not thought about this clearly or [in]telligently. If man arose without intelligent guidance, why should he have intelligence? Can [un]intelligence create intelligence? Yet atheists believe that intelligent man, though he cannot create life or even anything more intelligent than himself, was created by a force with no intelligence. Does it make sense?
To say that there is no Supreme Intelligence is to say that the universe has evolved something higher than itself, it has created intelligence. And to think that anything can create something it does not itself possess is the most vacuous kind of empty-headed reasoning.

To illustrate: If we were create with the [in]telligence to to think or to plan with the 'mind initially', then life must therefore have a purpose. Look around us, the majourity of things designed, were created with/for a purpose in mind. Take for example the "Automobile", It was designed for the purpose to carry us from one place to another. The "Clock", also designed for the sole purpose for telling time. Hence, if we as [un]intelligent beings can design/create things for a purpose in mind, so to with the 'Creatour of the universe' able to design with his vast knowledge the [in]telligence to create/design humans for his purpose in mind.
Even men with the keenest intelligence cannot create intelligence that is superior to their own. Oh, they have made robot brains. In the mathematical field they are superb. Yet they are not more intelligent than man.
A distinguished mathematician & logician of Princeton University, Alonzo Church, has carefully analyzed electronic calculators and mechanical brains. He said: “No machine can ever solve all problems solvable by a live mathematician.”

It is written: “What can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. Ever since the creation of the world his invisible [essence], namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.” (Rom. 1:19, 20, RS)

Isaiah 40:26 “Raise YOUR eyes high up and see. Who has created these things? It is the One who is bringing forth the army of them even by number, all of whom he calls even by name. Due to the abundance of dynamic energy, he also being vigorous in power, not one [of them] is missing."

Einstein said: “condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.”

“There are probably a thousand conditions which would have to be fulfilled before man could inhabit the earth. Not only must there be light, many kinds of food, water, proper atmosphere, appropriate temperature, the nitrogen cycle, etc., but there are hundreds of chemical reactions in the body which contribute to man’s life processes. The chance that all conditions for life would have been fulfilled by pure chance is one in billions. It is very evident that the earth was prepared for man. This fact alone proves the existence of a conscious God.”—The Physician Examines the Bible, p. 318.

“The greatest single achievement of science, is the discovery that we are profoundly ignorant” by science writer Lewis Thomas

Answer 2

The universe and all issues in it continuously evolve. Evolution is replace and alter is a elementary theory of action. All actual remember is in action, so all remember evolves in a minimum of that way. through fact the flaws in the universe are evolving, so too is the universe recent technique evolution. The direction wherein it evolves, if this is declared to have a favorable or damaging direction, is basically in terms of ways we interpret it. Is the universe wakeful? probable no longer in the comparable way that we are wakeful, yet in a quantum way we reason the universe to be wakeful, and vice-versa. this is been shown that wakeful assertion resolves quantum uncertainty. with the aid of definition, if something reacts to a stimulus, then this is declared to have a understanding of a sort, even no remember if this is not lucid in the comparable way that we are. the great bang replace right into a metamorphosis in the state of existence itself. That transformation would be categorised as evolution through fact it represents replace. that's philosophically analogous to a genetic mutation that's a function of organic and organic evolution.

Answer 3

Well if i was going to follow any myths i prefer the Greek ones. Seem to be more fun. Like Cupid the god of erotic love, and the asphyx the spirit of death. Much more interesting to learn about i find.

Answer 4

I would say that they did help. It's like when you have gastroenteritis. You have to start with the chicken broth and work your way up to the bread before you can start eating sausages and stuff. You can't live on chicken broth forever but if you try to eat the sausages straight away you'll just give yourself the runs.

Answer 5

hmmm, don't think so - myths are an attempt to portray the spiritual in physical terms, of course the problem is we don't have any of the myths in their original form. They've been passed down, and in the process, changed

Answer 6

no,
evotlution is a lie./