2006-10-06 08:18:02 · 39 answers · asked by Grinner5000 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Hey hurskefan, loved your answer "Although it is possible that future wars with Iran, Syria and NORTH Korea will happen, stop trying to imply that Bush is a warmonger." I make that 5 countries invaded in 5 years. What was I thinking, implying he was a warmonger? Will you accept my humble apology? God, I feel like I've really made an idiot of myself here.
2006-10-06 12:32:32 · update #1
Having read all the pro Bush comments so far, I have to say, you people are more blindly deluded and pathetic than i originally imagined. Can anyone come with at least a half arsed justification for his actions because so far "yeah, right" and "you're so deluded" don't really make for a convincing arguement.
2006-10-06 12:35:08 · update #2
The nameless, faceless sub-humans who really control our government behind-the-scenes (wealthy elitists, lobbyists, special interest groups, oil companies and big business) ordered Bush to illegally invade Iraq - and they will also order him to invade Iran as soon as they can concoct a plausible reason for doing so (that brainwashed ditto heads will 'buy'). Since they already know "weapons of mass destruction" won't work, they'll have to come up with some new excuse, and that invasion will happen before the spring of 2007 for the very same reason Iraq was invaded: those rich fields of easily-accessible OIL.
After Iran, I'd predict Bush will invade Venezuela. He attacked Iraq because his family held a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein and because Dick Cheney coveted all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands.
Bush has a personal vendetta against Chavez (since his infamous U.N. speech last month), and Dick Cheney wants all that OIL that Venezuela might start shipping to other customers.
-RKO-
2006-10-06 08:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Lexembourg and Wales can not be easily associated with terorism. They would be difficult for Americans to believe in their justification. But countries like, Qatar, Jordan, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Kazakhstan would be easily acceptable to American public. They can either be accused of terrorism or oppressive governments that require regime change in the interest of United States.
2006-10-06 23:43:07 · answer #2 · answered by MAFOKOCHIZHI 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you implying that you think Bush is going to invade Iran, Korea and Syria?
2006-10-06 08:29:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Korea before Iran
2006-10-06 08:29:19 · answer #4 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, hopefully by then, his term will be up. But he doesn't want to go anywhere where there isn't oil. Hmmm.....I have read a few responses about Venezuela, and you know it would prove a point if he does go there. His excuse for the war on Iraq was for standing for democracy and to stomp out terrism when in fact, it has only increased. It will be interesting to find out what excuse he comes up to go to South.
2006-10-06 08:42:07 · answer #5 · answered by raquel r 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush declear himself a crusseder and recently supported by pope Bendict. so why Bush invade Wales or Luxemberg next instead of middle east and africa?
2006-10-06 21:24:00 · answer #6 · answered by basit 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of those. i could look ahead to the surgical invasion of a small us of a which could no longer come on the factor of protecting itself. possibly a Caribbean us of a and demanding usa will INVITE us in to unravel some concern. not one of the 4 you indexed could be on the checklist for a number of motives, which incorporates that it does not be an invasion that we could win. we want the Rogue states and pariah states which includes Iran, Syria, North Korea, Venezuela to stay concentrated on quite than the countries that truly are a risk to the U. S., which includes China and its exports to us, Saudi Arabia and different Islamic states that export their terrorism/Islam.
2016-10-15 22:06:11 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fortunately Bush will be out of office in only 2 years, so don't worry.
2006-10-06 08:44:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
guess bush won't be around to do the invading unless he declares himself dictator, which is not impossible. after those 3, Venezuela or cuba are most likely i think. i'll go with ven, because of the oil.
2006-10-06 08:22:19 · answer #9 · answered by Boring 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well Wales basically owns America....so they will have to do what Wales tells em - (lol).
(over half the signatories on the declaration of independence were welsh men).
Eg...Thomas Jefferson was welsh..
2006-10-06 22:03:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋