Since he didn't have form and all we know is that he creates, his image would be that of a creator, not human.
Making us creators, creating.
The image was a role. Not a shape.
I'm not into creationism like how this story states, but this is the only way I can make any sense of this without dismissing it from all possibilities.
2006-10-06 08:09:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Corey 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
First Account (Genesis 1:1-2:3) Genesis 1:25-27
(Humans were created after the other animals.)
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let us make man in our image.... So God created man in his own image.
Second Account (Genesis 2:4-25)
Genesis 2:18-19
(Humans were created before the other animals.)
And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
Not with blatant contradictions like this in it! When will people wake up and realize there is no such thing as god?! They can't accept the fact that when we die that is it, so religion was fabricated to make us appear to go on after death
2006-10-06 15:18:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ah, nostalgia for Spring 2006 on Y!A... how long it's been since I've heard the phrase 'sky pixie'.
I suppose they'd have to modify that 'God created man in his own image' stuff though.
I like it personally. It reminds me of Tinkerbell. I see Tinkerbell as a worthy deity - what more could we ask for in this life than eternal youth?
Plus Tinkerbell was kinda hot. In a Disneyesque way...
2006-10-06 15:09:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by XYZ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Most people would (not me, I'm an atheist).
The rest of the bible is full of outlandish stories, so a sky pixie wouldn't be all that wierd.
2006-10-06 15:09:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually genisis came from the summerians texts written 1500 yrs before moses wrote his version. and it doesnt say making man in gods image. it says lets make man in our image. but like you say people believe what they want to believe
2006-10-06 15:11:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that the fact that God looks suspiciously like a mammal is reason enough to be ...well...suspicious.
2006-10-06 15:11:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by eantaelor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
its sky wizard thats the current approved slur
2006-10-06 15:09:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You question is irrelevant, because it states in black and white what really happened.
2006-10-06 15:08:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Investigation Specialist 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-10-06 15:33:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋