Mandatory Abortions! What a great idea!?

Question

Why do religious people care so much about saving life of unborn embrious while children in Africa simply starve to death yet it doesn not offend their cristian compasions. Hippocrats! You f-ucking c-ocksucking crazy-a-ss lunatics.
There steam about this.

Answer 1

My heart doesn't break at the thought of those starving children.

Answer 2

First of all, nice language, I know everyone appreciates that. Second, one of the big problems is the fact that people/"religious people"/Christians aren't aware of all the really horrible things that go on in the world. And then if they know about things like what happens to children in Africa, they don't know what they can do about it so often it ends there - I mean really, what can we do??? If you tell me how I can fix the world (and you're right), I'd love to try! And since we don't know how to fix major issues around the world, sometimes people tackle the ones they feel they can make a difference by taking a stand on, and some people choose abortion as one of those.

In conclusion, there are worse things than abortion. But that doesn't change whether abortion is right or wrong, and so maybe anti-abortionists are hypocritical but at least they're standing up for something at all and at least we can understand some of the reasons why they come across that way (to some).

Thanks.

Answer 3

Your statement and mouth only show that Satan is alive and well today!

What life have you saved today, last month, last year. Have you donated money to the organizations who are over there feeding the children who are starving to death? Are you a member of a church who is sending missionaries and loads of money to other countries where people are starving? Have you worked in a crisis relief center and handed out food and clothing to the poor and starving? Do not judge what you know nothing about.

God be with you.

Answer 4

First of all not all people are that cold, every day i would change things for those children if I could. And no one has the right to judge people for their feelings, do you want to be judged for what you do. Do you have sex, are you married, if not by some peoples opinion that would make you a whore and you will go to hell, in other words, so what if you dont like what these people think, its their right, get over and get on with life.

Answer 5

Preface: I help equality for comparable gender couples, oppose the demise penalty, and help the girl's suited to chosen to end her being pregnant That stated -- Your arguments are unpersuasive to those that do no longer share those perspectives: a million) homosexuality -- religions oftentimes require a sort of practices wherein a guy or woman workouts will power to reject organic dispositions. God made us human and our human will is composed of the potential to make options -- which includes the choice to maintain from intercourse till now marriage, the choice to sidestep cheating on a extra robust half... and the choice to no longer have interaction in comparable-gender family. 2) abortion - in case you settle for the anti-abortion place that the foetus is a guy or woman with human rights (as your argument seems to do) the entire theory-approximately non secular ethics relies on the thought even nevertheless it may be god's will for a guy or woman to die -- the killer is making a option to kill - and that's incorrect -- god could make his will take place in many strategies, if the killer chosen to no longer kill, the sufferer might have perished in yet another way 3) demise penalty - properly, I personaly in basic terms understand non secular people who're unfavorable to the demise penalty and am uncertain of what the non secular argument may be to have a mundane government execute somebody. in spite of the shown fact that, at a wager -- the great majority of religious writings contain some algorithm that contain the final suited of the government to kill risky human beings. consequently - to the non secular that's obvious that God can and does supply authority to accomplish that -- maybe as the thank you to guard the harmless from the wicked. ie: possibly its no longer approximately "judging" the guy in a extensive sense yet in basic terms a remember of protecting the wide-unfold public -- which would be seen as a non secular criminal accountability.

Answer 6

Yeah. This one has always gotten to me too. So much craziness over the life of a fetus but when it comes to children already in this world, a blind-eye or a back is turned. Maybe because African children are not white? Given what happened in Rwanda, and as cynical as it sounds, it could well be the case. So much for brotherly love.

Answer 7

We live in the US, this is OUR country. We have too many problems with other countries right now to have to worry with why other countries are starving when we're KILLING innocent lives. They don't even get a chance to live, your mother gave you that chance and noone's complaining about your existence. I don't understand how people can be so selfish.

Answer 8

Hello Jessica.. :)

We care about every life..I am taking a course to become a missionary to Africa, so I can help clothe and feed the hungry.. :)

In Jesus Most Precious Name..
With Love..In Christ.. :)

Answer 9

"religious people" as you call them are concerned about starving children. you must not know of the many organizations out there helping to feed as many children as they can. as great as it might be if all could be helped, it really is hard for every person to be reached and given necessities. i wish it could be. so, i believe your statement is very incorrect. there are many being reached thanks to the money, prayer and time given by many christians.

Answer 10

I did save one child from starving to death, of course he is my own

Answer 11

I don't know one single person, Christian or otherwise, whose heart doesn't break at the thought of those starving children.