Incorrect.
2006-10-06 04:41:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For getting knowledge about the comparative movements, you have to choose a reference that is outside the plane of the 2 objects and you have to be motionless at that point.
But if you chose earth as reference, then you can draw the orbit of all other planets around this reference. The same thing can be done by taking the pole start as reference too. Vedic Literatures take Polestar as refference.
Current Scientists prefer the reference of Sun, as it is easier for them.
All the proof mentioned in the article is again with the assumption that the Start must be fixed or have a very slow motion. This assumption is considered thinking the stars to be very gigantic and capable of only slow motion. But that cannot be taken for Granted.
Newton’s Law of Gravitation stressed that a smaller body must be moving around the bigger body. But that also suggest that if the force of Pull is uniform then the Large bodies like Saturn and Jupiter should be nearer to Sun.. But we see that there are many small planets also very far and very near the Sun. Hence Newton’s law does not explain the how the various orbits where assigned to various planets, if the law governing them is just gravity.
To know the actually fact you have to go to the end of the universe and check, still how do you know that the universe itself is not moving?
However, for study of astronomy, any reference is sufficient. And so why bother if Sun is moving or Earth is moving or both are moving?
2006-10-06 07:30:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Parsu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What makes you think of that basically because of the fact the earth circling the sunlight does not equivalent out to an entire quantity, this isn't any longer suitable. Does each and every thing could equivalent an entire quantity to be suitable? Why does Pi have a limiteless form of decimal places? Why can not we basically calculate the circumference of a circle using an entire quantity? this is alright to have a million/2 an quantity and nonetheless be suitable. in basic terms humanistic questioning.
2016-10-18 22:23:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by grewe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You misunderstood the article you posted. It explains why the earth is the body moving around the sun, not the other way around.
Go read it again. Better yet, just read the last line:
"So, aberration, parallax and Doppler effect all prove that Earth is moving around the Sun, and not the other way round."
2006-10-06 04:44:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by s2scrm 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes we are not to be fooled by satanic psuedo sciences such as astronomy.
"This fool [Copernicus] wishes to reverse the entire science of astronomy; but sacred scripture tells us that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, and not the earth." Martin Luther
2006-10-06 04:43:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that depends on what you would consider to be the stationary object..... if you were to assume the earth is stationary .... then it will appear that the universe is revolving around earth.... if you take the sun to be stationary.... ( which science does) ...... then you will see everything revolve around the sun..... it will hold true for any object in the universe......... there is no way to prove it.... its like quantum physics... it depends on which point you view it from.... so is science correct or ancient beliefs...... both are correct and both are wrong.... its just how you look at it........infact both are just illusions..... whats the truth....... there is no truth.... there is only one truth .... and that is God..... one can see these illusions everywhere ......
2006-10-06 04:52:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Siddhartha 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
did you actually read that to the end?
Quote: "So, aberration (slight change in stellar positions due to Earth's speed), parallax (slight change in stellar positions due to Earth's changing position) and Doppler effect (slight change in color of stars due to Earth's speed) all prove that Earth is moving around the Sun, and not the other way round."
2006-10-06 04:43:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shinigami 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please don't breed.
Even the Catholic Church accepts the earth going round the sun theory.
Plus you really should've read the article closely, try again, it turns out differently than you think.
2006-10-06 04:42:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Apparently you didn't read the entire article, as I just did.
2006-10-06 04:45:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
proof the sun circles the earth!!!!!!!!!!!!!?
No it is not - read it ALL!
Why not start quoting the quaran too............... YUK.
http://answering-islam.org/Quran/Science/index.htm
2006-10-06 04:50:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by whynotaskdon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋