Even if the idiotic premise of premenstrual tension would serve as an excuse for not electing a woman, there is a case to be made that at least she could schedule around it except for crisis. And no one, at any time knows how they will behave when they get catastrophic news. Why they could just sit there reading children's' books for seven minutes after being told that "America is under attack". Nope, you just never know.
As to men being less emotional, and having better self-control, take a look in any prison system and meet some men who have a different tale to tell.
An intelligent, moral human being with concern for all, would be a good president.
And I don't care which sex or which party
2006-10-06 02:19:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by justa 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
That’s like asking can a man be a better president than a man, or woman better than a woman. There are some women that would make better presidents than most men and some men that would make a better president than most women. The bottom line is what PERSON is best qualified at a given time—any other question is a waste of time.
2006-10-06 08:52:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by damdawg 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do not believe it should make a difference, and hopefully we are electing the best qualified for the position. However it is clear that Mankind is not comfortable with Women ruling the world.
Equally the question should be..can anyone other than W.A.S.P. Men get elected? How about Colin Powel for Prez?
I typed this while hiding in my office.
2006-10-06 09:55:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by KnightZone 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm conflicted on this issue.i believe that a woman can do the job as good as a man on an intelligence level.i do wonder about the innate emotional difference between males and females.i think most everyone can agree that women are more emotional than men.
how would this affect her during a very emotional time,such as seeing bodybags,innocents die.that sort of thing.
2006-10-06 09:11:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The God given differences between men and women include srtess during crises, etc. Women usually have less control of intense circumstance, there lies the problem. A woman might be to soft when they need to butt heads with agressors.
2006-10-06 08:52:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. Know 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Almost any woman would make a better president than the Democratic candidates that have run lately. Even that "where's the beef?" lady. And she is dead.
2006-10-06 08:50:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course!
A woman would try to resolve a conflict differently, rather than showing off who got the biggest gun...
2006-10-06 09:44:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No better or worse than a man.
But at least men have the advantage of being somewhat civil 30-31 days of the year instead of 25-28. :D
2006-10-06 08:48:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Sure she can, and I believe she'll run the country better too. Other countries will know not to mess with her during her menstraul cycle b/c she may blow their @zz away
2006-10-06 08:54:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by madtyga2002 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure can't be any worse. However, you wouldn't want a murderess like Rice or Janet Reno.
2006-10-06 08:54:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jabberwock 5
·
0⤊
0⤋