Absolutely yes!! It can also lead to him getting cancer or leukemia, a blood cancer. He should at least take mega vitamins especially E and C and drink extra water.
l
2006-10-06 01:17:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by lcmcpa 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Keep in mind submarines are afloat more than they are submerged. When afloat, fresh air is circulated.
Unless there is a leak of some genetically altering substance, which goes undetected for an unsafe period of time, I'm sure there's nothing to worry about.
Now, this is just my opinion, hopefully you'll find some actual statistics on this topic. But still, I feel your husband will be fine!
2006-10-06 01:37:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alice Chaos 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No! Unless he was exposed to an immense dose of radiation which is much more likely to leave him sterile than having a child with defects.
2006-10-06 01:26:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by purpleshirt27 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
"SCIENTISTS are difficult at artwork to attempt to stumble on genetic motives for alcoholism, homosexuality, promiscuity, violence, different aberrant habit" except homosexuality isn't aberrant, yet bypass on... "would it not no longer be a alleviation to stumble on that we are no longer to blame for our movements yet are only sufferers of biology? it really is human nature responsible someone or some thing else for our blunders." i'd imagine it might require a complicated interaction of both, and different elements that make contributions in course of it. they are trying to stumble on predispositions in genetics, no longer certain motives. "If the genes are responsible, scientists carry out the potential of fixing them, eliminating undesirable features by genetic engineering." probable, yet i'd assume there will be very few particular issues they are allowed to modify, like making resistance to particular ailments stronger, case in factor.
2016-11-26 20:47:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by lohr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only radiological hazards and certain viruses can affect his ability to pass on his genes. The situation would be different if you, the mother were in the hazardous conditions.
2006-10-06 01:19:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by insideoutsock 3
·
0⤊
0⤋