Evolution is a mehanism people use to deny that fact that a very creative and wise Creator created this world.
What do think?
2006-10-05 23:40:29 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
A wise creator?Are you kidding me? Your telling me that the idea that people started out as a simple life form and evolved over billions and billions of years into what we are now is crazier then some Magical God who got a handfull of dust and created man..then took out his rib and created a woman..put them in a magical garden that just so happened to have a snake there who convinces them to eat from a single tree that gives you knowledge and once we ate it we were condemmed for all eternity until God then decides to give his creation a back door policy by sending his son to earth to save everyone and then we end up killing him...Give me a break man! Animals are evolving all the time..we constantly find evidence of human remains that are millions of years old...and yet you still think that the earth is 6000 years old...you are insane!
2006-10-05 23:45:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
I don't need Evolution to deny a "wise creator created this world". The Bible does that quite well. Its deity Yahweh the god of Moses is not wise at all. There are dozens of contradictions and dozens of scientific errors in the Bible. If it's the word of God, he is an illiterate imbecile to utter such malarkey. I've been an engineer, so I used advanced mathematics daily. The Bible says pi is 3, but it's actually 3.14159... Close, but no cigar! if I use the Bible in engineering work, I will be wrong in all calculations involving circular shapes. Shall I tell the boss that I'm using the Bible that's the word of "a wise creator"? I'd be fired. The Bible's first account of David's census says God inspired it. It later says the Satan did. That is a glaring contradiction...unless God and the Satan are really the same being. I can list many more Bible errors, so who needs Evolution to deny God?
2006-10-06 00:18:00 · answer #2 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is there to gain from purposely denying the existence of a creator. Your reasoning is flawed.
Scientists didn't accept theologian stories at face value and sought more credible answers. Evolution is a very sound theory and makes far more sense than the bible since the proof is everywhere to be seen. Instead of denying this theory outright, investigate it for yourself - read the books written by biologists like Stephen Gould or Richard Dwarkins. Investigate the evidence for yourself. Look at at the bone structure of animals such as birds and see how it relates to their ancestors. Why do some birds still have traces of limbs? Why did the large beak finch develop a smaller beak in response to migrating to a different geographic location? Why do bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics? Where do dogs come from?
2006-10-07 03:53:55 · answer #3 · answered by MrSandman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that religion is a myth invented by man to explain our existence. Unfortunately, mankind continues to hold on to these archaic beliefs in the face of insurmountable scientific evidence.
Evolution: Don't be scared by Christians who tell you evolution is "just a theory". It's "just a theory" in the sense that it is the best scientific explanation for the origins of humans. On the contrary, there is not a single shred of evidence for creation.
"very creative and wise Creator": God isn't necessary to explain the origins of the universe. The universe contains much mass. Einstein demonstrated that mass=energy. The Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only transferred. This means that, in some form, the universe must have always existed. This is hard for us to understand, because everything we see in our lives has a beginning. This means God couldn't have "created" the universe.
2006-10-06 00:47:49 · answer #4 · answered by Nowhere Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is fact, what are you going to believe?
Millions of Scientists that have proved so many things like cures for diseases or are you going to believe some thousand year old book that could have easily been fabricated and changed throughout the years following the death of Christ.
The Bible was written over 500 years after the death of Christ, So how could you believe everything it says happened? Without any physical proof.
Science proves everything including evolution.
2006-10-05 23:55:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
"Microevolution" and "Macroevolution" are not even medical words. Creationists CREATED those words at the same time as they could no longer deny that adaption (aka "microevolution") takes position. the only mission is, we've documented information of speciation (aka "macroevolution"). we've spoke of it instantly. And the only large difference between "micro" and "macro" evolution is in scale- a lot of small alterations (micro) upload as a lot as large alterations ("macro"). Micro+micro+micro=macro. there is not any magical line the position small alterations in a genome can't boost till 2 elements of a inhabitants can no longer interbreed. In essence, there is not any "micro" and "macro" evolution. there is only hassle-free evolution. "Cosmic Evolution" and "chemical evolution" don't have any more some thing to do with the organic and organic evolutionary theory, which only deals with how living issues replace by the years. I recommend you get out of a "lutheran biology classification" and right into a authentic biology classification the position they extremely prepare good technology. EDIT- the worry-loose language utilization of the note evolution isn't an same because the medical time period. the conception of evolution encompasses the total huge form of mechanisms (like organic decision) by skill of which living issues replace by the years. to attain the status of theory, it has lengthy previous by huge peer evaluation and no contradictory information has been got here across. A theory is the utmost factor a medical hypothesis can income; gravity is a theory, the heliocentric variety of the universe is a theory. @Member- Wikipedia will be edited by skill of any moron with an IP take care of. it truly is why it really is not any longer a valid source in an difficulty. The words on on there because creationists have yammered on about them a lot that they are getting worry-loose language communicate- that would not lead them to medical words. fairly scientists do not use them, we use the right words for the phenomenon in touch. "Microevolution" and "Macroevolution" are nonsense words because there is not any delineation in mechanism- evolution is evolution.
2016-11-26 20:41:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A creator , wise beyond our understanding , did establish and organize the universes. The method that he uses is Evolution.
2006-10-05 23:48:18 · answer #7 · answered by samssculptures 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Evolution isn't a mechanism-natural selection is a mechanism. Evolution is a fact beyond any doubt supported by evidence that can't really be questioned. I think if they were being brutally honest most creationists would concede that they're powerless to challenge it in any meaningful way.
2006-10-05 23:53:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well I believe that Creator start something but evolution did the rest!
2006-10-05 23:43:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I disagree. In fact I'd rather say that Creation is a mechanism people use to deny the fact that we're on our own and that this life is all we get. The thought of that is apparantly too depressing for some.
2006-10-06 00:10:23 · answer #10 · answered by undir 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋