It is a good thing. You are not going to be forced to take it.
2006-10-05 20:01:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The government was on about inoculating for Cervical Cancer, which i think is a brilliant idea.
I think that any help to prolong some ones life that may otherwise have been cut short by this disease is an excellent idea.
I have known two people who have contracted cervical cancer one was lucky enough to have the disease caught at an early stage, the other lost her life a short while ago so yes i would agree to having this life saving injection.
2006-10-05 21:08:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by redditch b 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
The UK Government are proposing giving vaccinations to girls to prevent the HPV which can lead to an increased chance of developing Cervical cancer. I think it's a bloody good idea.
According to the BBC this already happens in parts of America.
2006-10-05 20:04:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andy M Thompson 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think you should actually read the news and not make half-witted comments about it. The injection you seem to be referring to does not prevent STDs, it reduces the risk of the virus which causes cervical cancer, which can only be a good thing.
2006-10-05 23:10:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by sarcasticquotemarks 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
there must be a need for it if the government is going to this bother, kids nowadays are sexually active from a very young age which is scary as i have kids of my own. would it not be better to keep them safe with this injection. although i have to say what happened to allowing kids to be kids, some parents cant seem to get their kids grown up fast enough, i still played with dools etc until i was 13
2006-10-05 22:56:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by A G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
big fat lie to the people in the world.... there are many cures for cancer for thepast 30 years, it's just no money to make with the cure, the big millions are in the desease. governments are not intereste din healthy people. they use the scare tactics, then they lie about how many people are afected and died and then they bring the vaccine out. lot of bull...open your eyes and look around. do independend research, not government or pharmaceutical ones. They fund each other. search for the truth
2006-10-05 20:46:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by kati 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
are you sure its not an injection to help prevent the virus that causes cervical cancer? as this is something completly different. It would be impossible to stop STD's as there are so many of them
2006-10-05 20:04:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by kirsty w 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
My daughter is 14 and yes, I would let her have it. It's not for STD, it's for cervical cancer. And it has to be given to them before they have sex. Like girls gets rubella jabs before they have babies, too, to prevent their future babies being affected.
2006-10-05 22:22:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I find this discriminating to 13 year old boys.
2006-10-05 19:54:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wtf? I don't believe there is such a thing... but I wouldn't want it if they said there was... I don't trust the government for nuthin... for all you know they might be injecting you with a microchip or some kind of disease instead... smh
2006-10-05 19:56:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Misheee! 2
·
0⤊
1⤋