2006-10-05 15:26:47 · 27 answers · asked by j b 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
no, that's on the same line as animal testing for cosmetic reasons, but for medical reasons yes they should test on animals,
and they should keep the baby if it was consensual sex
there are always exceptions to every rule, but i think that having over 2 abortions is overdoing it, and they should take better care, i know of ppl that have had between 6-8 abortions, and i think that that is when it should be addressed, it should not be a hobby, but used for necessity
2006-10-05 15:32:09 · answer #1 · answered by Dawn C 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, an innocent child is killed, it is murder.
Why should the child pay for the actions of the rapist? The child didn't ask to be conceived. If the mother doesn't want it or can't afford it, give it up, there are lines of parents waiting to adopt babies. Yes, it's terribly sad and hard for the person raped, yet no matter how hard it is for the rape victim it doesn't justify murder and at least the rape victim is ALIVE! If the rape victim has the child it would be a selfless act, the mother is thinking of someone other than themselves, an abortion is the ultimate selfish act. Women have the unique role in this world of being the bearers of life and as such are uniquely called to protect life.
Yes, it's a terrible and sad murder as the crime is also. Sh*t happens and sometimes there was nothing you could do to prevent it.
P.S. How would the rape victim (or anyone) feel about being put to death against their will when they get old and the family finds it inconvenient to help them out with say, grocery shopping? It is a scary thought, isn't it? That's why the old carry "no euthanization" cards in Norway.
INCONVENIENCE IS NOT A REASON FOR MURDER!
2006-10-05 15:48:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
i guess i do not in good structure into that class. I see the existence as harmless even with what got here about throughout creation. even with the indisputable fact that, it type of feels to be the politically ideal challenge to assert "except in situations of rape or incest". i anticipate it quite is because professional-lifers keep in mind that law might want to not in any respect bypass if that word develop into left out. All that being suggested, I accept as true with Chi guy that i visit understand the female's distaste for wearing and giving beginning to a newborn that develop into the outcome of such movements. i'm particular the psychological torment is the reason of permitting the abortion.
2016-12-04 07:55:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not one word in the Bible says that abortion is wrong, death, murder or even sin. And that is because God himself uses abortion every day. If it were sin, then God would be a sinner. And because the Bible does not even call it murder, then we must assume that there is no death in abortion. God must therefore save the soul of the fetus for use at another time.
It is clear that because God himself uses abortion, we too are expected to use abortion to carry out his will.
2006-10-08 14:41:10 · answer #4 · answered by Give me Liberty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The taking of an innocent person's life, born or unborn, for what ever reason is murder. God has never changed his mind about it and never will.
As for the reason you gave, the vast majority of abortions are done for convenience, not rape, incest, or the threatened life of the mother.
Incidentally, you folks that are pro-abortion should consider something: Do you realise that most abortions are performed on white female citizens? Hispanic, black, oriental, and others have the fewest incidents of abortion. The reason for this is to lower the white population in the United States. Coupled with unrestrained immigration, the indigenous citizens of the U.S. are quickly becoming a minority in our own country.
When we are vastly outnumbered in our own country, by those immigrants who have no intention of assimilating into this country, the next thing to go is the constitution and the rights guaranteed by it.
At that point it sure would've been nice to have the 1.5 million (per year) natural born U.S. voting citizens (of ALL races) on your side to stand with you. Unfortunately, they and their off-spring wont be there because you had them murdered.
Sucks to be you!
Dear Old Dad
2006-10-05 15:54:52 · answer #5 · answered by Dear Old Dad 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
With your permission, I would like to ask a question before I answer. Does abortion kill the fetus? If it does, I believe that to be premeditated murder! Why would conception by rape justify murder? In my opinion, 2 wrongs don't make a right ! There are many crisis pregnancy centers in this country who would be glad to help place the baby in a home with parents who can afford to raise the kid in the event the mom can't.
2006-10-05 15:32:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. And it does significant secondary trauma to the victim as documented in many psychological journals.
Funny thing is, women who have abortions have a 50%+ rate of suffering from major clinical depression within three years, and that number goes up, not down, until it plateaus (forget the final number, and I can't find the source right now).
It has been found that rape victims who carry to term, then offer the child for adoption or who keep the child, adjust better tot he primary trauma of the rape because something potentially positive -- life -- has come from their torment, and it re-empowers the victim, in essence, 'stealing back' her sense of power.
So not only is it murder, it's unhealthy for the victim as well.
And before anyone assumes -- I'm not a christian, I'm an atheist, and like a good atheist, I look at the scientific facts, not some scriptural dogma.
------------------
And morning after pills are also a form of abortion and thus murder. Once sperm joins egg, you have human life.
2006-10-05 15:33:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
No I don't because she didn't ask to be put into that situation. What is the victim is a 12 year old girl who is in school? You can't just raise a child when you are a child yourself and you must think of what is best for the baby.
2006-10-05 15:31:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, it's not the child's fault it's parent was a rapist, but on the other hand life is very hard and very painful so i understand that it might not be so bad to die a quick death, than be hated by an unloving parent Personally i could never harm anything purposefully that was also hslf of myself
2006-10-05 15:33:07 · answer #9 · answered by good advice 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
not a pro lifer, pro choice al the way. just if i dont want it and you choose not to abort can i excused from responsibilities. you can give up the baby without my permission.
hey prolifers what if the woman could die like my aunt did if they remain pregnant. is it okay then
2006-10-05 15:30:51 · answer #10 · answered by vexed and glorious 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋