Can you be Eco Friendly and still have children?

Question

Creating more consumers doesn't sound environmentally friendly to me. I better now turn off the tap whilst brushing my teeth, my neighbor has just given birth to twins and there just isn't enough water to go around.

Answer 1

Many people cite the fact that most of us won't see the major effects of environment damage in their lifetime, and most would be in your childrens or grandchildrens lifetimes.

Mabye if you had a small number of children and thought them to be careful to the environment, you would care more about the condition of the earth (just a thought).

Answer 2

You can; however on a finite planet increasing consumption is not sustainable.
So how to have children without increasing consumption?

A good example is Ladakh, india. a high altitude desert that has a stable society for 1,000 years by social and environmental awareness. eg one wife for several men. Monasteries for younger sons. eldest inheriting when marries not on death of older generation. but mostly through a budhist lifestyle & philosophy.

In the west today having children cannot be environmentally friendy because of the consumer industrial growth culture - just try talking to any parents driving MPVs or 4x4s on the school run about what environmental issues they are storing up for their kkids to inherit - the reaction will be universally hostile

Answer 3

mom nature has no longer and can't "continually be triumphant" over the stress of human beings. We do many stuff to assist the surroundings and characteristic tried over the years to set examples for our children and grandchild. a number of those issues are: a million. utilizing gas effective vehicles, and utilizing non-motorized or mass transportation as a lot as conceivable (we biked lots as a kin). 2. utilizing fabric diapers. 3. utilizing refillable water bottles truly of shopping for infinite throw-away bottles. 4. Recycling pretty a lot each little thing. 5. Taking our youthful ones camping out, out on the paths and lakes, and to nature classes to assist them boost an appreciation for the organic international. 6. utilizing each danger to variety or communicate about why we do this stuff. our youthful ones have discovered this lesson so properly that the tables at the instantaneous are became, and they often times nag us to do a better suited pastime of saving the surroundings!

Answer 4

Sure.

Caring about the environment does not mean giving up technology, or having children, or other important things in life.

It means doing these things more carefully and thoughtfully. Instead of worrying about things like having children and using water, worry about things like wasting water by having Kentucky Bluegrass lawns in dry climates. Half the water in Denver goes to watering lawns. There's plenty of dumb stuff to fix, without worrying about giving up things that are important to living well.

Answer 5

Sure it is the same as being eco friendly and still drive a car.

Answer 6

Yes, one, this would halve the world's population if made an international requirement in one generation and restore stability.

Answer 7

Maybe its best you don't have children. We don't need you passing on your particular set of genes to someone else. The sooner your type become extinct the better.

Answer 8

yes just because you have kids doesnt mean that you are going against the environment. in fact, you can help teach your kids about the environment and how to protect it.

Answer 9

you are not echo friendly either.

unless you are a cave man who scavanges through the forest looking for food, you are guilty too

Answer 10

yes. its just important you teach em about it othr wise the wont no better