The priests of the different religious sects dread the advance of science as witches do the approach of daylight, and scowl on the fatal harbinger announcing the subdivision of the duperies on which they live.
2006-10-05 11:06:11 · 14 answers · asked by trouthunter 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
one of his more famous works is "The declaration of independence"
2006-10-05 11:08:49 · update #1
The funny thing is, you guys keep talking about how "science will come and show how wrong you are".
We are still waiting. And talk about faith, you have faith that science will come and save us all. Science is becoming a religion, lol!
Religion will always exist and science will always be just as science
2006-10-05 11:08:26 · answer #1 · answered by aliasasim 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It amazes me how the religious claim that science proves the bible true, when it's the exact opposite.
For example...The Big Bang theory caused many sects to claim that that's what was really meant by the genesis tale.
The things that evolution shows have been twisted by the church. When their beliefs began to be invalidated, they went to semantics and coined the terms of "micro" and "macro" evolution. This statement could not be more true, given the church's history of condemning and holding back any type of scientific progress. The faithful seem content to continue on living in the dark ages as far as knowledge is concerned...
BTW, Buddhism is philosophy, not religion...
2006-10-05 11:20:09 · answer #2 · answered by Bill K Atheist Goodfella 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can we do the same thing by making some foolish statement about Islam and say it's from a famous Muslim, without naming him. That;s exactly what you're doing, Who was this "famous" American ?
Also, if you're trying to spread Islam, I would suggest you do it in a positive way. I know your theory- - - if you can't rise to the level of the other religion, then try to tear the other one down to your level. Negativism is bad in politics, but it's just as bad in religion. What you're doing is driving more and more people away from your beliefs.
2006-10-06 07:26:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Kyoto protocol is a profiteering scheme in step with junk technology, yet this author is extremely maximum remarkable in any different case. Carbon credit are no longer something yet an arbitrarily and favoritistically assigned vehicle for paying for money for doing no longer something. they seem to be a strange new form of tax based upon some thing that can not particularly be measured and isn't any longer particularly the source of the subject. better than that, Carbon credit are designed to bankrupt the loose industrialized international and empower the rising communist superpower wannabes. it is why Kerry, Gore and Obama are so squarely at the back of them. jointly as we could continually try to decrease the authentic pollution in the ambience and make the means of production greater effective and much less pollutant, it is photograph voltaic flares and not "greenhouse gases (water vapor being the main well-liked of those)," --- or perhaps those so-referred to as greenhouse gases ensue greater as a results of organic technique than all of human industry could ever placed out --- which reason the superb degree of climate replace. CO2 and Methane are basically noise in the equation, and that it is man made slightly quantities to a hill of beans in the bigger photograph. additionally, it is international cooling, and not international warming, that we could continually difficulty ourselves approximately. international warming produces greater plant life, greater animals, and subsequently greater co2 for plant life to respire and greater plant life for the animals to devour, etc, etc. international cooling kills vegetation, animals, and societies. we could continually be happy the earth is warming up, nonetheless this is going to possibly no longer heat as much as the degree it did in the middle a protracted time, while Greenland replaced into certainly eco-friendly and supported farms from end to end.. Sustainability is a unfavorable misnomer derived from gaia religions. Their theory of a sustainable human inhabitants is 500 million globally, and that they ould kill the rest off in the event that they could.
2016-10-18 21:26:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
After hearing about that museum in Georgia, or whatever it is, that has murals of Adam and Eve and dinosaurs walking together to explain the Bible and evolutionary process together. I don't see how they can dread anything.
2006-10-05 11:10:04 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny0050 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Show me one place where Buddhism 'dreads the advance of science'.
Science has only confirmed my faith in Buddhism.
2006-10-05 11:12:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/JP2COSM.HTM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre
The Catholic Church and Jewish Theologians found no problems with Darwin's theory of NAtural Selection and says it does not cotradict the Bible or Creationism.
2006-10-05 11:13:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i cant say i agree with it. Thomas said many things that were much more important.
2006-10-05 11:09:30 · answer #8 · answered by K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
100%.
2006-10-05 11:11:12 · answer #9 · answered by Marc B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
afraid not for many scientific discoveries have proved the BIBLE to be true not false.
2006-10-05 11:09:19 · answer #10 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋