We should stop it for longer than that. We don't even screen these people for diseases properly. For example, TB was stomped out of our country a long time ago. Now, with all of the immigration taking place from places like Africa, it's back in this country again. Think about it: they take our jobs, live off of those that are paying taxes, get housing and education tax free for so many years, free health care etc...need I say more?
2006-10-05 11:10:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Doodlebug 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
not a simple question at all.
I dug in the archives, and on Yahoo Answers (India) back in the 1800s, someone once asked "should we stop immigration and gin-drinking empire builders at least for a few years?" Some people answered "yes, because they're robbing our country of its wealth to the detriment of born and bred Indians" and others said "no, because they're quite good at building railways and organising and stuff like that". The debate raged on, and was never simple.
It's not simple now. But one thing is clearly different: the balance of wealth is in the opposite direction this time, favouring the incumbents over the arrivistes. That surely has to figure in your calculation of what is really "fair".
2006-10-05 11:12:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by wild_eep 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No it shouldn't be stopped but it should certainly be capped per annum.
There should be regulations on people from the EU having say for example a certain skill or having a job lined up already.
I would never say stop immigration as I've worked in other countries myself but had a hell of a hard time getting the paperwork sorted!
I think for asylum seekers they should have to have a certain time to establish themselves in the UK and not be allowed benifits.
My boyfriend moved here from the USA last year on a 2year visa and is not allowed access to any public funding so I don't know why anyone else should!
2006-10-05 11:16:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Purple 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
A Big Yes!!!!!!!
Illegal immigrants by the Gang Caught in London 1,00,000
London Population 7.5m i.e 1 in 75 are part of the gang
England Population 50m so 1 in 500 are part of the London Gang caught and they get what 8 yrs in jail with such huge numbers suffereing. They deserve to be hanged and every immigrant (illegal only) be caught and sent back and the country who sent it should be taken to task in the UN for allowing such a crime to happen
2006-10-05 23:51:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by CashBack Charlie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Something as simple as a 5 to 7 year moratorium on all immigration would give this country time to sort things out.And to decide what is best for America and the American people.There is only so much room ,we must closely monitor our population,its becoming far to crowded in this country as it is.The strain on resources and public entitlements is unprecedented by any other period in history,it must be stopped altogether .Then restarted slowly and try to stabilize our growing population.
I know immigration is a problem in many country's but I can only speak of the country I know and that is the USA.I live in Arizona and we are over run by illegals.It must be stopped.
2006-10-05 11:30:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
sentencing is almost continually deferred to ensure that the probation provider (or adolescents offending crew when it comes to a minor) to practice what's usually a pre-sentence record (PSR) for the courtroom. The courtroom can not sentence someone without being completely appraised of the information of the case (summarised from the papers from CPS and defence), the offenders motivation, rationalization, regret and so on, sufferer result the offenders circumstances (as a outcome topics about his asylum software that may be pertinent if the courtroom were pondering a deportation order) and evidently the sentencing thoughts accessible/ maximum likely sentence to handle the risk elements, preclude extra offending and therefore rehabilitate the criminal (in an perfect international for sure) even as judges are very knowledgeable and may want to sentence without this that's undesirable education to finish that in the legal equipment. My guess is this develop into deferred specially for topics round immigration and deportation to be considered on the fringe of sentencing, this would not were performed previous to now as we paintings on an harmless till shown (discovered) to blame equipment in this united states.
2016-12-04 07:44:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes we should,i am just a normal British person but i am sick to death of people allowed into this country at the drop of a hat.Not only do we allow them to come in but we also allow them to preach hatred against us. It is time we wake up and do something about it Already we have given up our way of life to accomadate these people.Every thing that was British is gone we are not even allowed to fly the union jack for fear of upsetting someone it is a country gone mad stop europe making our laws for us and allow only the people that want to live like us into the country
2006-10-05 22:00:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by scott j 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
YES and ill give you a good reason why...... the asian guy who runs the local shop was spitting mad this morning and i asked him what was wrong. he told me he is running 2 houses and he let 1 of them go to 2 kosovans .... he never got a penny rent from them for 6 months and went round to ask what the problem was and to tell them to pack up and leave. anyway the asian guy pushed past the kosovan and to his astonishment he found 50 illegal immigrants shacking up in his house. the immigrants are now being shipped back to kosovo. the asians argument was the scams go on as an immigrant gets a fake id to work as they did then rent somwhere out lo and behold makes a phone call asking all there mates to come over he said there was matressess all over the house he phoned the police straight the way. thats 50 less for us but its easy as this TUT!!
2006-10-05 11:23:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
YES!
No more immigration until we can get a wall built, and round up all the illegal aliens who are here and deport them all, along with their anchor babies.
Then we can start fresh and start with complete control over who immigrates here, to protect this nation and normalize our economy.
During that time we can get a system in place to take care of employer checks on employees, get a database in place to monitor all social security numbers, get some of the homeless into the jobs illegal aliens are working, clear our schools of illegal alien kids, cut back on some of this out-of-control costs of education, get our hospitals back on their feet, clear our our jails and prisons of illegals so we don't have to pay more money to build more, stop printing every scrap of paper in a dozen languages, get the immigrants who are left here to learn ENGLISH,and take a breather from this destructive invasion of illegal aliens that is ruining our country.
2006-10-05 13:11:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by shoshone 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think it would turn down the heat a little, but we are not allowed to stop some immigration as we are a member state of the EU and other EU citizens are rightly or wrongly allowed here freely.
2006-10-05 11:07:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by iusedtolooklikemyavatar 4
·
0⤊
1⤋