Here's a start:
http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm
http://www.youdebate.com/gun_control.htm
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=471
http://www.misterpoll.com/results.mpl?id=3274597275
http://plsc.uark.edu/arkpoll/fall99/policy/GUN3.HTM
2006-10-05 10:33:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
First, this poll will not be a legitimate sampling of the public, people on this site tend to be very polarized to the left or right.
Many people oppose more restrictive guns laws not so much because the right of people to possess arms is a constitutional guarantee in the US, but because many people realize that the ability to kill another person has nothing to do with firearms.
People have been killing people since before written history. One of the oldest written documents, The Bible, tells of the 10 commandments which admonishes people to not kill one another. This was thousands of years before guns came to be.
Even if they were to eliminate firearms people would still find a way to kill others. As far as the Amish schoolhouse killings are concerned, if he hadn't brought a gun he would have use the knife to kill the girls.
2006-10-05 10:41:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know where you can find reliable data on this issue. While we have the right to bear arms in our Constitution, that right was given before we had such organized law enforcement and before we had Supermarkets from which to purchase our meat. In this day and age, we only need a few hunting rifles for recreational hunters. Nobody needs military type weapons or handguns. Their only purpose is to kill people. It's a disgrace that we don't have good and strict gun control. But the NRA will argue that if we put on controls, only the criminals will get weapons, because they will do it illegally. I think that's a lame excuse. No individual needs automatic assault weapons. They should be banned except for military and law enforcement agencies, and people caught with them without a license should be sent to prison! This is just my opinion, however, and for every American who feels as I do, there is probaby another one who disagrees.Mostly, it will be the hawkish macho men who will disagree. Women usually don't need guns to make them happy. Good luck with your research.
2006-10-05 10:35:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wiser1 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
generally, the public does not give a hoot either way until the gun is thrust in their precious face! Those that have guns will be effected differently than those without! The National Rifle Association maintains a survey every two years ! Try their website
2006-10-05 10:35:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by K9 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is a town just outside of atlanta ga. (kennesaw) i belive. where it is city law that all households have a gun avaliable for protection. This area has the lowest crime rate in that region. guns don't kill people. a man with a good knife and a bit of skill could kill just as many before anyone could stop him. not to mention what a few boxcutters can do.
2006-10-05 10:33:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by truckercub1275 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Gun control laws only works on those who are willing to obey the law., and the law abiding citizen is not the problem.They have ZERO effect on the criminals.
2006-10-06 02:09:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by WC 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
They are not needed. Instead the government needs to enforce the laws it has already enacted.
One other point: I believe it was Adolph Hitler that enacted very, very strict gun control laws.
2006-10-05 10:26:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The ***** youths will never give up their guns, hence more restrictive gun control laws will only affect law abiding citizens.
Most shootings the media doesn't cover, because its blacks killing other blacks or blacks killing whites.
2006-10-05 10:43:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by midwestbruin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that we should have strict gun control. We need to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and children. No assault weapons of any kind should be sold to the general public!
2006-10-05 10:26:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by georgiapeach 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
If civillians who go through firearms training aren't to be trusted, what's the difference with police officers?
2006-10-05 10:34:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋