English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-05 10:02:25 · 16 answers · asked by House Speaker 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

16 answers

No. At least the belief did not originate with Christians.

2006-10-05 10:05:19 · answer #1 · answered by Shaggy 3 · 0 0

The term “Trinity” was first used around the time of the 12th Pope, St. Soter (166-175), and the 13th Pope, St. Eleutherius (175-189). Theophilus was bishop of Antioch, and use the Greek “trias”, which was Latinized into “trinitas” about A.D. 180. He speaks of "the Trinity of God [the Father], His Word and His Wisdom ("Ad. Autol.", II, 15). The term may, of course, have been in use before his time.

Afterwards it appears in its Latin form of trinitas in Tertullian ("De pud." c. xxi). In the next century the word is in general use.

Just as the word “Trinity” is not found anywhere in the bible, we both know that its meaning is explicitly taught. The same goes for other doctrinal concepts that, though the term is not found in the bible, we know its meaning is explicitly taught.

2006-10-05 17:24:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Yes it is, although the Bible does not have the word trinity in it, it speaks clearly of God being the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Just as water has three different uses and is all H20,
fluid
ice
water vapour

so has God.
He is triune

2006-10-05 17:16:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, it is not, there is no such thing as the trinity.

“Concerning that day and hour nobody knows, neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father.” (Matthew 24:36) How do these words confirm that Jesus is not Almighty God?

Jesus says that the Father knows more than the Son does. If Jesus were part of Almighty God, however, he would know the same facts as his Father. So, then, the Son and the Father cannot be equal. Yet, some will say: ‘Jesus had two natures. Here he speaks as a man.’ But even if that were so, what about the holy spirit? If it is part of the same God as the Father, why does Jesus not say that it knows what the Father knows?

1st of all Jesus said: He pointed to God as the Source of his life, saying, “I live because of the Father.” According to the context, this meant that his life resulted from or was caused by his Father, even as the gaining of life by dying men would result from their faith in Jesus’ ransom sacrifice. Joh 6:56, 57.

Jesus’ being called the “only-begotten Son” (Joh 1:14; 3:16, 18) does not mean that the other spirit creatures produced were not God’s sons, for they are called sons as well. (Ge 6:2, 4; Job 1:6) However, by virtue of his being the sole direct creation of his Father, the firstborn Son was unique, different from all others of God’s sons, all of whom were created or begotten by Jehovah through that firstborn Son. So “the Word” was Jehovah’s “only-begotten Son” in a particular sense,

Jesus is also “Mighty God” and “Eternal Father.” This does not mean that he usurps the authority and position of Jehovah, who is “God our Father.” (2 Corinthians 1:2) “He [Jesus] . . . gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.” (Philippians 2:6) He is called Mighty God, not Almighty God. Jesus never thought of himself as God Almighty, for he spoke of his Father as “the only true God,” that is, the only God who should be worshiped. (John 17:3;


Rev. 1:1; 3:14, RS: “The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him, why did God have to give the revelation to Jesus, if he is God? .

Does the Bible teach that none of those who are said to be included in the Trinity is greater or less than another, that all are equal, that all are almighty? Mark 13:32, RS: “Of that day or that hour no ones knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.” (Of course, that would not be the case if Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were coequal, comprising one Godhead. And if, as some suggest, the Son was limited by his human nature from knowing, the question remains, Why did the Holy Spirit not know?)

John 14:28, RS: “[Jesus said:] If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I.”

1 Cor. 11:3, RS: “I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.” (Clearly, then, Christ is not God, and God is of superior rank to Christ. It should be noted that this was written about 55 C.E., some 22 years after Jesus returned to heaven.

A person who is really seeking to know the truth about God is not going to search the Bible hoping to find a text that he can construe as fitting what he already believes. He wants to know what God’s Word itself says. He may find some texts that he feels can be read in more than one way, but when these are compared with other Biblical statements on the same subject their meaning will become clear. It should be noted at the outset that most of the texts used as “proof” of the Trinity actually mention only two persons, not three; so even if the Trinitarian explanation of the texts were correct, these would not prove that the Bible teaches the Trinity.

2006-10-05 19:40:19 · answer #4 · answered by BJ 7 · 0 1

To be put briefly, the answer is no. Psalm 83:18 says that the Most High's name is Jehovah. When announcing Jesus' birth, the angel told Mary that she would give birth to the SON of the Most High. Are Jesus and his Father equal? Jesus said at John 14:28,"The Father is greater than I am." 1 Cor. 11:3 says that God is Jesus' head, just as Jesus is man's head, just as the man is the woman's head. What can be clearer than that?

2006-10-05 18:40:45 · answer #5 · answered by LineDancer 7 · 0 1

I'm not Christian, but I used to be. In church they teach that while the Trinity is three parts, it is also one. Its confusing, I know.

2006-10-05 17:14:50 · answer #6 · answered by forrest_rain 3 · 0 0

I believe Trinity is a defining doctrine of Christianity.

2006-10-05 17:10:25 · answer #7 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 2 1

I don't believe in belief. christian is one thing Trinity is quite another.

2006-10-05 17:44:29 · answer #8 · answered by samssculptures 5 · 0 1

Islam said that 1400 years ago

2006-10-05 17:09:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I guess that depends on how one defines "truly Christian".

2006-10-05 17:06:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers