Because they don't care about using proper English grammar to speak casually or to write casually.'
2006-10-05 08:40:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bluealt 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I overlook approximately that rule. that's an occasion of somewhat wisdom being a unfavourable element. i think of it comes from wrong innovations approximately what a preposition is for. human beings look to think of that the "pre" part of the call ability it has again in the previous something else, or that because of the fact it exhibits the dating between 2 issues ("the e book is on the table"), it can not come on the tip. it could additionally derive from attempting to word Latin grammar to English. (or perhaps that became the rule of thumb approximately splitting infinitives, this is impossible in Latin, because of the fact the infinitive is a single be conscious.) yet prepositions could additionally seem as part of verbs, and that i'm hoping no person would be stupid sufficient to declare you won't be able to have a sort of on the tip of a sentence. for example, "submit with". from time to time there's a single verb which ability the comparable element - "tolerate," case in point, yet from time to time there is not any longer. whilst conversing correct to the interest of cricket, for example, you could say, "The batsman became run out." "Run out" is the right way of announcing how the competition surpassed over the batsman from play. (There are others, which includes "caught out" and "bowled out".) you won't be able to circulate the preposition everywhere else in that sentence and characteristic it make any experience.
2016-12-26 10:35:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why not? the pedants define terms by whose authority? Language is a means of communication not an exercise in grammar. As the man said `if you understand, it's alright'
Note Winston Churchill's (one of the greatest communicators in the English language) reply to being corrected on this score: `This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put'
2006-10-05 09:12:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by deg273 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it has become a fashion.
Or, if you prefer: So many people end sentences with prepositions because it has become a fashion.
Also, people first started ending sentences with prepositions because of questions.
Sentences go:
What..?
Where..?
When..?
Why..?
etc.
Consider this:
To whom are you sending that letter?
Who are you? Whom are you?
Who are you kicking? Whom are you kicking?
Who are you going with? Whom are you going with?
The phrase "Who(m) are you" has a totally different meaning in each second question.
But people like to "get to the point" and start with
Who..?
What..?
Where..?
When..?
Why..?
Then it slowly permeated (soaked through or into) our non-questioning sentences, into "declarative," "Imperative" and "Exclamatory" sentences.
2006-10-05 08:59:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by husam 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
What's the problem with that? It has been a feature of English for 2000 years, why change now?
2006-10-05 09:41:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Taivo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since every sentence is followed by another sentence there is nothing wrong with doing that.
2006-10-05 08:41:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by that'sBS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Same reason they begin a sentence with a conjunction.
Because they want to. :-P
2006-10-05 08:36:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by BAWAGS 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
And a little Australian , sick in bed, said to her mother ,
"Mummy, what did you bring that book up about down under for"
2006-10-05 09:17:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ted 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No real reason that I know of. Perhaps because they want to. What do you want them to end it with? What do you want them to change for?
2006-10-05 08:38:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kris 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because that's how most people talk. If you give away some money, are people more likely to ask:
"Who did you give your money to?"
or "To whom did you give your money?"
"Where are you from?"
or "From where are you?" or "Whence are you?"
2006-10-05 08:41:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by jugghayd 4
·
0⤊
0⤋