2006-10-05 07:35:36 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
its just a metal fence about 12 feet high.
2006-10-05 07:36:42 · answer #1 · answered by john 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i'm in touch about the fence,estimates variety in spite of the indisputable fact that it style of feels it expenses about a million/2 of what the illegals fee the US each 12 months. it really is going to no longer could be carried out,if we had a neighbor who respected our regulations and our sovereignty,regrettably they recognize neither. as well we prefer to bigger stringently implement the regulations already on the books for this mission. Like jailing Illegals for unlawful get admission to contained in the first position,heavily fining employers who employ Illegals,possibly even increasing the fines. And we prefer to get a President who does no longer evaluate Illegals sufferers of the equipment,which leaves out each and each of the Dems.because those regulations are affected lots by skill of who's on the helm,as Bush has shown with the large open border that has existed in the time of his complete time period. the only different selection is to proceed letting the mission fester, in spite of the indisputable fact that human beings are starting to be offended adequate at this factor,that i don't think of they opt for to enable this mess bypass on a lot longer. YTP
2016-11-26 19:14:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its designed to keep people out .Not in like the fences/walls you are trying to compare it with.
Dynamics poll indicated the American people favor a proposal to build a 2,000-mile security fence by a 51-to-37 percent margin.
2006-10-05 07:53:23 · answer #3 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought the Nazi concentration camps had fences with guard towers, from books and old newsreels. I bow to your greater expertise, however.
I think it will be a double layer fence in some areas, vehicle barriers where drug running is the biggest concern, rather than illegal immigration, and sensors and cameras elsewhere.
However, we are protecting our southern border less viciously than Mexico protects its southern border, so what, exactly, is your problem with the fence?
2006-10-05 07:39:26 · answer #4 · answered by DAR 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
in my opinion its gonna look stupidly large , stupidly easy to go trough and stupidly undefended .
the republicans keep talking about the sensors and how modern it will be even when they know that a simple hole or a ladder can defeat it .
everyone knows a camera will not jump up the backs of those crossing , everyone knows it will cause huge loses and everyone knows a terrorist would not risk getting caught by crossing that way . he would ratter come legally obviously .
2006-10-05 12:42:19 · answer #5 · answered by game over loves evanescence 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What would be really cool is if we could build a wall like the one you see on Most Extreme Elimination Challenge. The one that's loaded with doors but only some of them actually open.
2006-10-05 07:38:20 · answer #6 · answered by Mag999nus 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Nazi concentration camp
2006-10-05 07:38:19 · answer #7 · answered by BUPPY'S MEME 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Are you referring to the fence that Boeing got the contract for? If you are - it is a virtual fence that will be patrolled with sensors and drones. It is not a physical fence.
2006-10-05 07:44:11 · answer #8 · answered by Special Ed 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It will probably look more like a ranch fence for cattle. I think that once it's up it's function will be to have a visible line for property delineation.
Then the little unmanned spy planes can be used better.
2006-10-05 07:39:02 · answer #9 · answered by Susan M 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It is going to look like a fence that surrounds a park or zoo.
2006-10-05 07:42:57 · answer #10 · answered by united9198 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋