So tell me...a bunch of extremists (in the name of religion) hijacked planes and hit the WTC on 9/11 killing innocent people trying to prove whatever insane point they had.
Bush, then said...great...this is my chance to take over all the countries that are producing oil so he went in with his troops to Iraq (a country that had nothing to do with the WTC) again killing innocent people(women and children).
The world is looking at 9/11 as terrorism and blaming Islam for everything but what Bush is doing is rite???? Please explain.
2006-10-05 05:36:33 · 8 answers · asked by Luv Peace 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Isn't Bush as much a terrorist as the next guy??
He's invading Iraq, killing innocent victims..then 5 years from now a son who's family was murdered in Iraq by our soldiers will strap a bomb to himself and blow something else up..
Do you guys see the cycle???
2006-10-05 05:38:28 · update #1
the only difference is that Bush has killed more than they ever did, well actually the other difference is Al Qaeda uses Islam as a backup religion and Bush uses the concept of patriotism as a backup excues, peace
2006-10-05 05:39:38 · answer #1 · answered by HK3738 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Okay, we'll start at the top- - the difference between Bush and Al-Qaeda. If you don't know the difference, all the explaining in the world would do no good, you're just not intelligent enough to understand it.
Second point. Bush did not say anything about oil, that's one that the rag-heads use all the time. If you were the head of a country that was bombed what would you do ? I don't think you'd go looking for oil.
Iraq had nothing to do with WTC ????? Boy, that's a good one. Where do you suppose they're training grounds were ? Who financed them ? Right, Iraq.
Are you blaiming Bush for all the killing of women and children that's going on in Iraq ? When someone walks into a crowd of people in a busy market, and blows himself and dozens of women to bits, do you blame Bush ?
When a bomb goes off in a police training spot, killing those who are training to protect, do you blame Bush ?
When Sunnis blow up a Shiite mosque, do you blame bush ?
What Bush is trying to do is to make a nation out of a mess that the people are determined to continue. If the people would work together, form a working government, aid the police and army, instead of bombing and murdering those who are trying to do good, Bush would love to get the Americans out of there.
The government of Iraq, the Sunnis, and the Shiites all said that if America pulls out now a civil war would break out that will probably drag in all of the Islamic nations.
So if you want America out of Iraq, all you have to do is civilize the people.Get them working together, instead of destroying, move them up to the twenty-first century, and out of the midieval times. Become somewhat human - - - and forget oil.
2006-10-05 13:14:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush has less to do with it than you might think. The guy doesn't make any decisions on his own. All his choices are made FOR him by much more sinister people. The problem with the Iraq war is that it is unwinnable. The instant our troops leave, there will be a bloody civil war that will last decades. The only people who "win" in the Iraq war are the contractors who manufacture weapons and control the oil industry. Bush and his cronies have really set USA back by at least 25 years. I hope the people behind all this evil crap are brought to justice within my lifeftime
2006-10-05 12:43:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush is a person, AlQaida is an organization.
better question would be what's the difference between bush and bin laden!
however, i agree with you. the US army is worse than a 100 Al Qaida.
Al Qaida didn't use religion as an excuse for the terrorist acts. think about it, why didn't they blow up the Canadian or German or any other country's embassy?!! why especially the US embassies, why especially the US navy ship in Yemen and why especially the US WTC??!!!
there's a personal war between Al Qaida and the US government that has been going on for decades.
2006-10-05 12:41:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stand Alone in a room with George Bush and his cabinet members and announce that Jesus Christ is not God. I assure you your life would not be in danger. Stand alone in a room with Al-Queda and announce that Mohammed was not a prophet and Allah is not God, and see what happens.
To accuse the president of our nation of acting like the extremist muslim terrorists is not only poor judgement, but shamefully disrepectful.
I assume you must be a younger person, because if you had many years of life experience, you would realize that many decisions, such as the one to invade Iraq, are not made easily or without great thought and caution. I'm sure if you could ask him one on one, he would state that he would rather not have invaded Iraq, however, for the safety of our nation (including those who disagree with the decision), it was a decision that had to be made.
The man is our president. Whether you respect him personally or not, the office and it's occupant deserve respect. Your question reaks of a blatant disrepect for the current administration and authority in general. You may disagree with its decisions, but if you don't feel that our leadership deserves at least some respect, you always have the option to leave.
2006-10-05 12:52:47 · answer #5 · answered by A Calm Voice of Reason 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is just a empty headed puppet who is presented to us so we can gnaw on him.
We still don't have a clue who's the tyrant(s) pulling his strings.
2006-10-05 12:46:11 · answer #6 · answered by lovedawhales 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The difference is Bush has nukes at his disposal, Al-Qaeda doesn't, yet...
2006-10-05 12:39:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The spelling and the pronunciation.
2006-10-05 13:08:14 · answer #8 · answered by camar 7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋