Do you agree that we should just go and nuke the North Koreans and the Iranians 2?

Answer 1

just one little one would set example that somebody still as balls instead of pussyyyy footing around them countries given the chance will use it in a heart beat they are irresponsible

Answer 2

The question is the most harebrained thing i've ever read. Peace would be the best option, but unfortunately, mankind is wired for struggle, fighting and survival. You can never nuke a nuclear power to stop them from nuking you. There are better ways to lose a war. Hiroshima and Nagasaki won't work again. A nuclear war will most probably cause a regime change in the US. And the US will stand naked forever without a single sane ally.Better to stop poking noses into their world and look at your own country. You are making a Faustian deal with developing countries by outsourcing your manufacturing. What prosperity you are enjoying now was earned before WWs and for a short period after WW. Better to introspect and consolidate your power and respect by a peaceful economic race. Your armed forces and intelligence communities are best used for defence(the inland peace after 9/11). Remember, it was you who introduced the Jihadists in the first place. Imperialism is long over. I think if Bush and his morons get outta the white house, there will be peace for the next decade.

Answer 3

No, because you would not only be "nuking" the right one's but he wrong one's as well. Look at it this way, if a country sent a nuke here, would you be standing outside saying, "yes I deserve this?"...You would be thinking that you didn't deserve this because you didn't do anything wrong. Well, think of the people there who didn't do anything wrong and are just stuck like we are. I believe what we did years ago in Heroshima and the other nuke bomb name, Yes right on and I am proud because I am an American and I believe that what they did to Pearl Harbor was terrible, but I also believe that we hit the wrong people, we should have aimed for the major part of the army, not the major part of civilians. But, once again, I am an American, and I will stand for us no matter what we decide, it doesn't mean I agree but I will protect my freedom, land, children, and country.

Answer 4

No.... For starters we are allies with South Korea and the fall out and other bad things that come along with Nuking a country would affect them in a bad way... Why would we need to Nuke the Iranians...? They have enough issues to worry about... At this rate they'll kill themselves off... The only people we should Nuke is the terrorists... We should gather them all up and stick them on a vacant island the nuke the hell out of it...

Answer 5

Just N. Korea , Iran would rapidly get the idea .
No need for NUKES , a cruise missle thru the window during breakfast would work just fine .
Hell , lets use a few hundred and splatter the whole government at once , along with their nuclear facilities .

Answer 6

nukes are your answer to everything isn't it? nukeing the country also means killing the children and their families living there too... think before you speak or type! i say go in shoot/capture the bad guys, make sure we have someone to run as leader of those countries and leave...

Answer 7

You are possibly writing from a country or citizen of one which has nuke already. I too am from a country that has nuke. Now if we can have them, why not Koreans and Irani's ? Why is this attitude of trying to monopoly who will have what and who won't. Probably you are an american, and its your national attitude.

Answer 8

I am going to save this answer as I can see I can use it over and over. The followers of Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter all believe in the Manifest Destiny. (Manifest Destiny is a phrase that expressed the belief that the United States had a mission to expand, spreading its form of democracy and freedom. Advocates of Manifest Destiny believed that expansion was not only good, but that it was obvious ("manifest") and inevitable …). Most of the followers of these individuals have the same views. Many hold religious beliefs that the end is near and because of that many of today's problems are pragmatic. They think the answer to things they need to address is force, never stopping to consider the fall out of such actions. When ever I hear them expressing such narrow minded opinions I think about a book titled “The Ugly American” (Ugly American is an epithet used to refer to perceptions of arrogant, demeaning, unthoughtful behaviors of Americans abroad. The term originated as the title of a 1958 book by authors William Lederer and Eugene Burdick…). Never mind the war might kill thousands as long as they are not Americans it is justified. During World War II there were some instances which even then raised many a persons conscience for example the bombing of Dresden on the nights of February 13 and 14 1945 we bombed and killed roughly 135,000 to 300,000 civilians. Another example would be August 6 and 9 1945 we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki over time killing roughly 428,000 most of which are civilians. Between England and America we have steered, dominated, assassinated countless Governments and countries. Seldom thinking about the pain and death we caused the populations but again there are countless Americans who believe if it is our best interest it is justified. If we need the canal, oil, natural resources we take them. Usually it is big business doing the controlling; they will lobby the politicians to do their bidding, and between the two they will control the publicity ensuring the media spins what it takes to control the American People. There are world leaders and individuals who when they tell the world what is going on are labeled everything from lunatic, tyrant,or they aim to over thrown the Free World.

Americans are too busy having fun to study or understand the situations. You don’t believe that? My mother is 93 and has dementia and is still smarter and better read then most college kids today. We hear everyday the school needs more money, have to have computers, have to this or that. Why is it that schools of 50 years ago and longer ago are better then today's? The answer has to be in what was expected at home and at school. Let me ask one thing many minority children have problems in class in particular the harder classes. Even those with a solid financial background use race as a explanation as to why they cannot do it. Then why did the minority children of 50 years ago and earlier learn it and just as good or better then their white counterparts? Why today do minorities from third world countries which make our worse ghetto look like a vacation home able to learn it? (They either learned it in a worse environment or are taking it home to teach it there).

I whole heartily believe there should not be illegal immigrates but the easiest way to stop it and in one day would strike at the Republicans. Make it illegal to rent or work a illegal and it is punishable by two years in jail, no excepts or appeals. I guarantee tomorrow they would be on their way home.



The Republicans want all social programs stopped, taxes lowered or done away with, a huge standing Army and no Federal employees. The debt does not matter as God is coming and we will not be here to worry about it. How do we pay for that Army? We don’t take care of our old and poor? They do not want the minimum wage raised in fact they want it reduced how can someone save for the future? My wife and I made a decent income but due an on the job injury we lost it and according to the Republicans I should crawl out and find work or starve.


One other thing we should realize is none of them have ever served and defended our country, so it is easy to preach this or that especially if one never has to get dirty or be in danger. The reason we are getting our butts handed to us we are fighting a war, while having to be politically correct and that just, puts the soldier in more danger. Lee at the end of the War of Northern Aggression considered frightening a guerilla war many Northern were already tired of the war and fighting a guerilla war would have taken years and they would have granted us our freedom. One cannot beat Guerilla warfare look at Angola, Viet Nam, Rhodesia, French Algeria, the American Colonies or the Israelis.


Bombing Iraqi, North Korea would be the end. Bombing Iraqi would contaminate their and possible other middle East oil supplies; it would solidify the Islamic Movement it would make every other third world country turn against us (so to make sure we could not get the jump on them) we would have daily assassinations and bombing just like they have in Russia and Baghdad.

Bombing Northern Korea would be just as bad if not worse. In October 1950, China entered the Korea war and kicked our butts. They dared us to drop the atomic bombs on them. They knew their population was so large that for us to be able to put a dent in it would have caused so much atomic energy to have been expended the world as we knew it would have ceased to exist. Well, they have even more people now; we would have a hard time using nukes on North Korea, as due to their proximity to South Koreas we would be killing an ally. The North Koreas rolled over the South in 1950 but would have a harder time this time. Japan has a non-aggression Constitution but I believe they would have to come to the aid of the South. If not and the North wins they would keep going over Japan.


No, only kids, literates and that bunch of professional losers believe that garbage of aggression. Have you ever wondered why China is everyone friend and why everyone in a political situation listens to them and takes their advise?










http://www.christusrex.org/www1/war/dresden4.htm Dresden Bombing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki Hiroshima and Nagasaki


God Bless you and the Southern People.

Answer 9

cityguynice-please note that this is an ignorant child and does not offer an opinion that reflects the majority of Americans.
Any American that agrees with this "person" has obviously no soul or respect for mankind.

Answer 10

No, because then our government would pay them to rebuild into a better nation. Look at Japan. Let's keep our troops and our tax money as close to home as possible, huh?

Answer 11

Bombarding North Korea and Iran is to put an immediate stop to a nuclear holocaust due to irresponsible handling of nuclear arms .