"I am very astonished about why you need a day of mass resistance. it is told you have one of the most traditional democratic systems. no? the mass of your people two times had the chance to elect their government - and they two times elected the same. so what suddenly is wrong with it? can the mass be wrong? and if the mass is wrong, what do you need your democratic system for? doesn't in a democratic system the elected government fullfill the will of the mass? really, from outside I cannot understand this."
2006-10-04 18:19:27 · 3 answers · asked by Lleh 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
It is a way of saying- "We thought you were worthy of the leadershiip of this state but, now we think you aren't."
Of course this has to do with some current scenario and change of events.
2006-10-04 18:28:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Elections, ok you talking about Bush? Because a lot of people were raised to believe that it is seriously bad judgement to elect a different leader when in a time of war. That explains his second election.
The first election, I don't understand how Bush won. Except that I didn't vote that year, which makes me as guilty as everyone else for what I'm about to say.
I believe that the real problem behind the urge for a mass resistance is a lot of people didn't vote at all, and now that this idiot has gotton his foot in the door and taken up residence, people are outraged. We should have simply voted against him in the first place.
2006-10-05 12:53:28 · answer #2 · answered by April J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mass is not necessary a majority, it could also be a significant minority. Sometimes that minority must stand up and be heard. The majority do not like to hear the opionions of the minority, and that's why it's necessary to band together and form resistance. It's one of the few ways to get the majority to take notice.
2006-10-05 04:17:21 · answer #3 · answered by justdennis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋