English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

IF Pakistan has yet to ratify either of the treaties, why hasn't it ratified it yet?
What role have landmines played in the development/destruction of Pakistan?
What are the strengths and failings of the CCW treaty and its second protocol regarding landmines?
Should nations use the CCW treaty or the Ottawa treaty as a basic framework for future landmine agreements?
Please cite sources if you can so I can research the subject further. Thanks.

2006-10-04 17:38:02 · 1 answers · asked by The Riddler 3 in Politics & Government Military

I looked it up and I found that Pakistan has not signed either treaty...

2006-10-04 18:31:50 · update #1

1 answers

To what it seems Pakistan stands firm in regards to the CCW treaty and the Ottawa treaty for clearing landmines. Currently it is faced with the Afghan's who are clearly very un corporative, and un justified within their own actions of taunting other countries and their governments of not giving them enough funds.

Most of the countries now know that the funds are not utilized to where they should be. Pakistan has already ratified both of the treaties,

There are not many landmines issues in Pakistan, but certainly there are many in Afghanisatan and Indian Administerd Kashmir. No such findings of land mines in local area of Pakistan are found.

Nations of the world should use the CCW treaty and the Ottawa treaty as a basic framework for future landmine agreements as it is essential for global peace and prosperity.

2006-10-04 17:53:34 · answer #1 · answered by Omar Zuberi 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers