they refuse to look at it, maybe they are afraid of what they will see, this is a very serious matter and when u think a woman has a right to kill their own baby then i guess its ok that all these murders are happening, the prison system shouldn't be filled up, u are agreeing to murder when u say its a woman's right to choose, she had the right to say no or use a condom.
if she was raped she had the right to put it up for adoption
if the child is not normal then she is putting a condition on loving a child and needs to give it up for adoption and get her tubes tied because she will never be a good mother if it comes with a condition, its supposed to be unconditional
if it is a matter of life and death for the mother, most of those cases the mother still lives when she has the baby, there are very few cases of mothers dying while giving birth, no matter what kind of illness she has.
it takes some sick ppl to agree to murder of an innocent child
2006-10-04 17:18:54 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
CHRIS...here is some facts for u, worldwide there are only about 600,000 deaths from women giving birth
yet there are 20-30 million abortions worldwide
More than 40% of all women will end a pregnancy by abortion at some time in their reproductive lives.
10-20 million abortions happen illegally
2006-10-05 03:32:48 · update #1
I'm an abortion survivor and I'm suffering from hatred-in-the-womb syndrome. I survived two attempts on my life while I was in my mother's womb and one attempted murder by my own mother when I was in my 20's (Dying confession of my grandfather because he knew about the failed abortion attempts).
Any woman who thinks they can get away with murdering an unborn child is worse than any of the top 10 most wanted of the FBI. Women who get abortions, the abortionists and the clinics which perform it are criminals plain and simple.
I'm now married and my wife and I have a beautiful baby daughter. At least my wife and I don't get nightmares when we go to sleep.
2006-10-04 17:33:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
I did look at your pictures.
However I have spoken with many, many people who have been faced with decisions after finding out that they were pregnant. I don't see the only options as being
1) abortion
2) adoption
3) keep the baby
There are a lot of other options (of course most of the ppl I talk to could have just been educated on birth control, went and got the free birth control the gov't provides, but they didn't know about all that, weren't informed. I'm a guy and know about all this because I took the time to get informed...so I could then make sure that my sister was well informed). My sister, friends, and other people I know I have spent a lot of time talking with people and informing them about their options. I don't belittle them, I don't pressure them, I don't say anything persuasive about my own personal views. I let them decide what they believe is the best option for them after they've been informed of the choices they have. They don't have to tell me what they decide, but they often do. I've noticed that once people are well informed about what choices they have, how each option would be undergone, etc, that people aren't afraid anymore about their circumstances and are able to be more rational in their decision making.
That said, I am still in favor of regulating abortion (set a time line of when it would be okay and at what point the fetus is now considered a child and citizen of the nation). This has already sort of been done with the passing of laws that say that if you murder a pregnant women that counts as two murders if the baby was past a certain point in time. Why not use that "certain point in time" as a reference to when the baby is considered a child/citizen....afterall in one law it is considered murder if someone takes the life of the mother, too, at that point in time and it seems that the majority of Americans agree with said point in time as being the legal "age" of citizenship begining (declared legally a child at that "age").
Again, just my own humble opinion.
2006-10-04 20:12:49 · answer #2 · answered by gabriel_zachary 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because you're using, as another user put it, emotional terrorism. Using grotesque images to try to hoist your views and agenda on the general population is nothing more than the propaganda of a zealot. The fact that you not only found those pictures, but posted a link to them should at the very least garner a comparison to the Westboro Baptists who protest the funerals of soldiers and want to protest at the funerals of the Amish girls who were killed a few days ago.
A fetus will not survive outside the womb on its own, therefore its not a human being yet. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? You claim a woman who was raped should give the child up for adoption, yet never once claim that you would take those children in. You show sympathy for a hypothetical human, and disdain for those who have truly suffered.
Come down from your Ivory Tower and look at the real world. You support sterilization for people whose viewpoints you don't agree with..."if the child is not normal then she is putting a condition on loving a child and needs to give it up for adoption and get her tubes tied because she will never be a good mother if it comes with a condition, its supposed to be unconditional". It's not a perfect world, and some people are not emotionally or financially able to support a severly handicapped child. You're life may be perfect enough to make the claims and statements you have here, but the real world is not.
As I said in your last question: If you are opposed to abortion, fine. Do the rest of the world a favor and shut up. Keep your sick rhetoric to yourself.
2006-10-04 17:48:14 · answer #3 · answered by Bill K Atheist Goodfella 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
To force a woman to have a baby after being raped is phenomenally uncompassionate - I wonder if you would, or if it happened to your underage daughter would you force her to have the baby? I think she would hate you for life if you did. To suggest that a woman should then have her tubes tied because she wouldn't be a good mother is not only cruel, it is also false - there are plenty of women who went on to become great mothers after being raped. There ARE medical conditions where it IS a threat to the life of the mother. There are medical conditions of the fetus where the baby will not survive more than 3 weeks, if that (look up "epignathus" if you don't believe me). You don't have to have an abortion, but it is not up to YOU to decide for others. Don't want an abortion? Don't get one. As to the "adoption option" I say a whole lot more people need to put their money where their mouth is - there are over 200,000 unadopted children in the US alone, and the figure is probably closer to more than 300,000. Abortion is a serious business, but to call all abortions "murder" is just bull... oney.
BTW: 40% of all pregnancies end spontaneously. The medical term for this is ABORTION, so God is the biggest "abortionist" of all. Have a nice day thinking about that.
2006-10-04 17:33:21 · answer #4 · answered by Paul H 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I must say these few things:
If a woman is raped, should she be made to go through nine months of pregnancy knowing she won't keep the baby?
Is is maybe less moral to force an unwanted child to be born? Think of how that kind of life would be.
Having a baby is very expensive, whether you keep it or not, and after a certain point, you cannot work while you're pregnant. Sometimes it's just not possible to go through with a pregnancy.
I am pro-choice, but I am also pro-life.This is one of the awful mistakes people make: thinking that you can't be both. Obviously, an abortion is something to be avoided, but in some cases, it is the best choice.
2006-10-04 17:27:10 · answer #5 · answered by queen42anne 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
A pro lifer's IQ is indirectly proportional to the number of links that they post. Why would any sane person look at the link of a "0" IQ prolife nutcake.
What you fools don't get into your thick skulls is that there is no death in abortion. There is no killing--- period. So there is no murder, no death, no sin and no waste. God himself uses abortion and he left all mention of abortion out of the Bible. Only a freak of nature can find any reason to believe as you do.
To put this as simply as possible, God does not kill in abortion. If you think otherwise, please quote the Bible to support what you say. If you can't support what you say, then shut up.
2006-10-04 17:42:20 · answer #6 · answered by Give me Liberty 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No one has the right to interrupt a life which God has allowed to begin, for any reason.
When choices have to be made, under emergency, or other very unusual medical circumstances, the mother has that right to make the unfortunate decision, but if it results in the death of either of them, it's still not right.
No one has the moral right to abort a child, or to murder someone. No one.
2006-10-04 17:45:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am anti-abortion - completely unless the mother's life is in absolute danger. Your facts are wrong. There are way too many cases of mothers dying at giving birth, both from the birth itself, or from prior diseases. If you want to argue, you need to know facts....not argue from the heart.
However you haven't asked a question, but used this forum as a platform to lecture. Do you think this kind of thing never really changes minds. Does someone on Yahoo Answer who is pro-choice, read your diatribe and have a revelation - oh my word look at that, I get it, I've changed my mind!!!!
It is naive to think this lecture will help. The people in this forum have their minds made up about all kinds of things--you aren't going to change minds this way.
2006-10-04 17:26:06 · answer #8 · answered by chris 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
1, i do most of my posting from work and do not hit links because i never know what is really in them.
2, i have had these pictured shoved in my car at red lights, left on my doorstep and under my windshield wipers. i do not need to see them. and it will not change my mind.
I watched the police pull the bodies of an 18 year old girl and her(and possibly my) 6 week old child from the wreckage after a drunk crossed the center line. You have NO right to shove this s**t in my face.
More kids are killed by drunk drivers every year than are aborted. but do you crusade against that...NO,, i guess once it is born it is on it's own right. does not matter what kind of life it will have only that you got your jollies off by forcing your beliefs on someone else.
dont like abortion DONT HAVE ONE.
but do not try to tell me and my family how to live ours.
2006-10-04 17:32:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You have every right to your opinion. If you are against abortion, great. Don't have one. You do not have the right to make that decision for me or anyone else. That decision is between God and the woman involved and not your business. Not everyone sees removing a clump of cells as murder. I am one of those people. I have every right to my opinion, just like you. I will make the decisions regarding my body.
2006-10-04 17:34:19 · answer #10 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋