English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It should be a straight fight without outside help.

2006-10-04 15:15:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

Singapore would cane the Malaysians to death.

2006-10-04 15:23:25 · answer #1 · answered by fat_bottom_girls_rock 3 · 0 0

In the short term, Singapore would be the one that have a greater chance of winning due to the fact that Singapore is a small country with an excellent network of roads and expressways.Thus , it is easy to mass the troops required for a fight.
However in the log run the chances of malaysia winning is considerably higher.This is due to the fact that malaysia is a larger country with a much larger population.As a result, it can adopt a strategy to make full use of this.
But in war the participants of that conflict only lose out in the end.This is because money that can be used for many other things such as improving the education system, end up being used in the purchase of ever more costly weapons of war.Even after the conflict, money still has to be spent on reconstruction work.
Therefore, in conclusion, war is of limited use.This is in view of the large amounts of resources required to wage it

2006-10-04 17:32:01 · answer #2 · answered by Mathieu 1 · 0 1

properly, shall we do a "tale of the Tape" like in Boxing. inhabitants Malaysia: 22.2 million Singapore: 4.3 million Land section Malaysia: 126,seven hundred squaremiles Singapore: 250 squaremiles GDP Malaysia: $229 billion Singapore: $ninety 8 billion on the different hand militia funds Singapore: $4.4 billion Malaysia: $a million.6 billion status military Malaysia: ninety six,000 Singapore: 60,500 My wager is that Malaysia would nonetheless have Singapore for breakfast if it ever desperate to invade.

2016-12-26 10:01:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

in the first attacked singapore won the war but when malaysia counter attacked the tiny island will wiped out... i hope it should not happened we should promotes peace not war

2006-10-04 15:33:39 · answer #4 · answered by joe5997 3 · 1 0

It depends. Who would kill the most people? Is that what winning is? Frankly, if there is a war, everyone loses.

2006-10-04 16:11:49 · answer #5 · answered by Big Blair 4 · 1 0

I'd bet on Singapore.

2006-10-04 15:23:08 · answer #6 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0 1

It depends on what side the US wants to support.

2006-10-04 15:25:15 · answer #7 · answered by MS.KNOW IT ALL 3 · 1 0

Lord, I hope it never happens, I like both countries.

2006-10-04 15:37:21 · answer #8 · answered by Zivien 3 · 1 0

Who cares..

2006-10-05 01:05:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers