2006-10-04 11:22:55 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
perhaps, but myths are much more entertaining to read then science =P
2006-10-04 11:25:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saying that science is smarter than myth is like arguing that the head side of a coin is worth more than the tail side.
2006-10-04 11:25:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How can "science" be smarter than "myth"? They are both mere concepts and have no thinking capabilities of their own.
2006-10-04 11:32:27 · answer #3 · answered by Dysthymia 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science and Myth have two different functions.
2006-10-04 11:25:28 · answer #4 · answered by Pablito 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes,If you believe that science is smarter than myth than why do you believe the myth of evolution.
2006-10-04 11:28:14 · answer #5 · answered by sonoftheKing 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't recall a religous council inventing penicilliin or the ancient Greek Gods building an airplane. I think the answer to your question is rather obvious. Yes.
2006-10-04 11:26:01 · answer #6 · answered by Skippy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, so much so, that science is the antidote of myth.
2006-10-06 07:18:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Science is a tool. Science has no intelligence. There can be stupid science as there can be smart science. Myth is also a tool. Hence, it cannot be intelligent or stupid.
2006-10-04 11:28:52 · answer #8 · answered by Your Best Fiend 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Did you know that Myth is a term that means explantion for events. It does not say it is a lie.
2006-10-04 11:44:37 · answer #9 · answered by Monika B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You do relize that even Sciencest have faith right? And what "myth" are you referring to? The ones that are obviously fake or the truths that people are terrified of because they don't understand them?
2006-10-04 11:32:30 · answer #10 · answered by celtic925 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋