English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

why stupid religious people critical the modern science about the human body stem cells to beat cancers in the future . and what's about the technology when they say to you need to pray instead to play the playstation or use the internet ?????????

2006-10-04 06:44:36 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

15 answers

What religious people is it that criticize or say you "can't" use a PlayStation or the Internet? I'm far past the PlayStation period due to my age, but if I had kids still at home, I would get them one, and we have Internet in our home and we are religious people. My grandchildren all have PlayStation and all family have Internet. See, we're not all like that. Now, that's not to say I believe you should spend all your waking hours on a Playstation or the Internet because one is missing life that way.

Also, it is up to each person what they believe in science and the use of stem cells. Not all Christians or religious people are flat out against the use of stem cells and for scientists discovering ways to cure diseases. For me, I'm a Christian and I want, yes I said I want, scientists to be able to use stem cells. However, I prefer them used by people who wish to donate stem cells. I do not want a viable fetus destroyed for this purpose as this is a life that God created. My daughter passed away due to Juvenile Diabetes complications. I want researchers to be able to go on and use all their means (except for cloning) to further research and find cures for diseases. I am a bible believing Christian having Jesus Christ as my Savior and Lord.

Try not to be so angered and critical toward all religious people, because we 'all' have different beliefs. In other words, don't put all your eggs in one basket. That's a joke. :)

2006-10-04 06:53:52 · answer #1 · answered by son-shine 4 · 0 0

this is an theory that assumes ideology will bring about a similar existence-type and this is basically a private selection ingredient. historic past shows that what we've faith governs how we act and it filters into law, coaching and scientific course. technology as we communicate can not tutor or disprove religious concerns neither is it possibly to in the close to destiny. If it may this area could boring because of the fact the solutions could all be self obvious. Your concept is authentic that technology and faith can co-exist which they do and maximum of technology is enthusiastic approximately operational concerns and isn't any longer tormented by using concept structures as this is all measurable and may be examined. it is basically foundation technology the place hypothesis is rife and the dogma is greater fixated on the outcomes than the somewhat technology. I trust your appropriate which you're able to have the two and with an open ideas i think of all of us can.

2016-10-18 11:49:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Before endeavoring on a complicated subject, I would research it myself. And calling religious people stupid is not a good start. History Class- Religious people are responsible for starting this country! Things that make you go HMMMMM!

2006-10-04 06:48:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You do not have kill off one generation to preserve another. Stem cells from the body of an adult will work even better than the future born. That is what is at issue here.


"For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;" Romans 3:23

"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6:23

"But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us." Romans 5:8

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:16

"That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation." Romans 10:9-10

2006-10-04 08:32:30 · answer #4 · answered by rapturefuture 7 · 1 0

These two are different things.Religion is a way of life.Science is useful for getting phisical needs.Praying is getting mental peace. Internet and others give pleasure to your mind.Praying in advance stage becomes meditation.That peace when one gets is not camparable to any phisical pleasure.So dont get confused. After attaining mental maturity one can understand that.

2006-10-04 06:53:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You are aware the ALL the positive results from stem cells are from ADULT and Cord stem cells?????
"Stupid religious people" support this kind of science...

2006-10-04 06:51:10 · answer #6 · answered by williamzo 5 · 1 0

God made creation, including the laws that govern it which we learn as science. God also gives life; we are allowed to be co-creators with him. He did not create one to oppose the other. Why, in good reason, would we create life only to kill it claiming that this will save life?

Life is sacred. Treat it as such.

Peace,

MoP

2006-10-04 06:52:47 · answer #7 · answered by ManOfPhysics 3 · 1 0

What language are you trying to speak now? Go and look at the pictures in your comic books

2006-10-04 06:47:30 · answer #8 · answered by Taylor29 7 · 1 0

Religion = Illusion

Science = Facts

2006-10-04 06:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 0 3

Better to leave religion and science in their separate realms.

2006-10-04 06:47:57 · answer #10 · answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers