English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

im getting a tattoo that is 1 inch in width and 10 inches in hight. i dont know if im being over prised or not. comments pls.

2006-10-04 03:10:31 · 7 answers · asked by mikee g 2 in Family & Relationships Family

7 answers

Thats actually really cheap. But it depends on the detail in the tattoo. Mine is very detailed and cost me $150 for black only.

2006-10-04 03:39:33 · answer #1 · answered by KeKe 2 · 0 0

it really all depends hommie. i got the one you see now and another one on my fore arm which is about 5 inches tall for 140 and the one it covered up cost 100 and it was like 9 little symbols the size of a dime

2006-10-04 06:55:17 · answer #2 · answered by HUSTLER 4 · 0 0

Sounds about right.. But depends also on detail and on color, and some tattoo artist charge hourly so do't sweat it..... A tattoo is on you for the rest of your life, so don't sweat the money sweat the art!

2006-10-04 03:13:29 · answer #3 · answered by my3rdeye008 2 · 1 0

a lot depends on the detail and number of colors. If it is just black like tribal or something similar I would day that's about right.

2006-10-04 09:34:48 · answer #4 · answered by funrdhdpeach 4 · 0 0

That actually sounds pretty cheap. Are you sure your getting it done by a an artist that is good?

2006-10-04 04:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

depends on a lot of things....what the tattoo is, how detailed it is, color or no color, where on ur body ur putting it and it even depends on what city u get it done in. i got one of my tats done in va and one done in atlanta...the one i got done in atl had more detail and was bigger but cost less.

2006-10-04 03:16:35 · answer #6 · answered by MsNic 4 · 0 0

get it on your lower back-guys always tell me i need one there-wanna see it on a guy

2006-10-04 03:35:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers