http://www.notmilk.com/
2006-10-03 18:42:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No,no proof of this, just mostly is a myth spread by PETA and other nutrition extremists. Because it is a foreign protein, in some it may provoke an allergic reaction, but that shows a functioning if misguided immune system
Human milk is better for a variety of reasons, and the lack of human milk can damage an infant's borrowed immunities from the mother. It is not having breast milk more than having cow's milk, soy or whatever.
There is a statistical increase in diabetes in those fed cow's milk formula compared to those fed breast milk, but there is not convincing evidence of a mechanism of immune system damage.
It's interesting that all this hysteria is fanned up about cow's mik, but no one is screeching in terror about the cow protein in beef. Not very consistant.
And don't waste your time on "nomilk.com" since it is just a PETA site that is unreliable.
2006-10-03 18:54:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
False
2006-10-03 18:40:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mopar Muscle Gal 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its false only in infancy mother's milk provide the baby with better immunity because the mother's immunity is passed to the baby.
2006-10-03 18:41:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by observer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
false, after mother's milk cow's milk is considered most protein rich
2006-10-03 18:46:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Haha.. Jus look at the whole world. Who died from consuming too much cow's milk? U shld know the answer now..
Take Care!
2006-10-03 22:10:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by monokye 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
.there are no studies that have proved this unless the milk was contaminated by something that could (e.g.)(Mad cows disease),E-coli,ect ...
2006-10-03 21:52:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by amber e 2
·
0⤊
0⤋