OOps, I think that Congressman had some pedophilac cybersex. And of course, his Jesus forgives.
2006-10-03 16:06:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Why can't these guys control themselves? Teenagers? I know Palm Beach is embarrassed.
2006-10-03 16:20:40 · answer #1 · answered by a_delphic_oracle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His Jesus forgives, but look at the consequence this guy has to face now. Lost his job and will probably never work again, criminal charges will come up I am sure, and not too many people like the guy any more which is life for a polotician. God is just.
2006-10-03 16:11:25 · answer #2 · answered by pink9364 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lol, I still belive America to be the land of oppertunity. Where no mater what backgound, creed or sexual orientation. Now in addition, if you break the law you should be punished only after proven in court.
If Florida wants this person as there representitive, they will make the choice.
I do not vote in Florida, just poke fun at their track record.
2006-10-03 16:20:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
"Gay people" refers to homosexual teleiophiles. One cannot be a homosexual teleiophile and a homosexual pedophile at the same time. It can't work that way. The person in question is a homosexual pedophile... and no, they shouldn't be allowed to be Christian Congressmen from Florida.
Pedophilia is having an erotic interest in children that exceeds one’s erotic interest in adults; likewise, having one’s primary erotic interest in adults is teleiophilia. The term heterosexuality refers to having an erotic interest in the opposite sex that exceeds one’s erotic interest in the same sex, and homosexuality refers to an erotic interest in the same sex that exceeds one’s erotic interest in the opposite sex.
The basic tenet behind describing the human sexual interests under discussion here is that erotic interest in children versus adults is just as integrated into a person as is erotic interest in males versus females. Pedophilic men experience penile erections when they view erotica of children in the same way that teleiophilic men experience erections when they view erotica of adults. Both gay and straight men show little reaction when viewing erotica of the less interesting age group in the same way that both gay and straight men show little reaction when viewing erotica of the less interesting sex. Thus, describing a man’s sexual interest requires naming both the sex and the age that interest him and leads to the terminology above.
Although non-specialists correctly use the word pedophile, that is, to be without regard for whether male or female children are targeted, the colloquial use of the word homosexual refers to homosexual teleiophiles and not homosexual pedophiles. Thus, statements such as “6–8 million boys were abused by age 18 by 1–2 million adult homosexuals” are half truths. Although it might be reasonably said that these perpetrators were homosexual pedophiles, there is no basis on which to believe they were homosexual teleiophiles (i.e., gay men). To refer to the sex in which the offenders’ were erotically interested and not the age is mere sophistry.
2006-10-03 19:56:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh, and now he's saying he's gay because a priest abused him.
http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2006/10/03/491211.html
When will people smarten up? It's not openly gay men who abuse young boys or have any desire to. *They* love other openly gay *men*. It's closet cases like Foley, priests, the mayor in Spokane, "good family men" who coach Little League, etc. who end up in this kind of trouble. It's men who have traded their integrity for a bit of power and acceptance.
*sigh*
2006-10-03 16:16:17 · answer #5 · answered by GreenEyedLilo 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
get a life.
2006-10-03 16:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋