Or in this modern age of easy morals and promiscuity has the "love" part of the "love + sex" equation become passe? Or for that matter, was Cole Porter all those years ago really just talking about sex and clothing it in the term "love" to avoid the censor's knife? And if it's really just sex we're talking about has that become too dangerous for singles to even consider? Not just from a medical/health perspective but an emotional one as well?
2006-10-03 12:36:00 · 6 answers · asked by Seeker 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Love will never go out of fashion and neither will passion.
Todays men and women like those in the past will still have sex just for the sake of having sex. But love is the glue that binds.
Sorry for all the cliches, but when the shoe fits, wear it.
By the way, Cole was refering to sex.
2006-10-03 12:42:18 · answer #1 · answered by Dale 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cole Porter was a homosexual and pervert. Don't use him as a shining example of anything. He was just using love to avoid the censors knife.
2006-10-03 12:40:35 · answer #2 · answered by orygunduk1 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
preparation does no longer inevitably recommend that one (or fleas) would opt for to bypass to school. many stuff must be preparation - adventure, training learnt in life, thoughts heard from elders. i imagine defining preparation as having attended college is extremely too slender.
2016-11-26 01:22:00 · answer #3 · answered by selzer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Birds and bees do it for one reason and one reason only; to propagate the species.
2006-10-03 12:43:20 · answer #4 · answered by Rudy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
humans were created to love.
2006-10-03 12:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by jesse s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree
2006-10-03 12:37:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋