Of course it does. That's why they post question after question after question about it and call us morons in the name of enlightment.
2006-10-03 12:34:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stiletto ♥ 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
Au contraire, I suspect that the reverse happens to those foolish enough to disbelieve. The battle against evolution stems from the church as wanting to give credit only to God, and not natural selection. But then Christianity has evolved too...December 25th was not Christ's birthday but that of Mithra, a pagan deity and also of Adonis, and the gold, frankincense and myrrh were gifts to Krishna. Mithra supposedly died, buried in a stone cavern and resurrected in three days...sound familiar?...All of these things were used by Constantine to alloy paganism and Christianity....that's kind of evolutionary. We can trace the changes in mankind by the skeletal remains of many specific groups (unfortunately there are still gaps) and the evolution in somethings is well depicted, as in the fangs of venomous snakes, and classically, Darwin showed the modifications of the beaks of island birds to adapt to the available foods. Interestingly, we can demonstrate a difference in the activity of the Russell's Viper venom throughout its range from hemolytic in some regions to a coagulant in others. It is nature slowly changing to make the species fit the habitat, and it continues today.
2006-10-03 19:55:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Frank 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
no, i dont think they get enraged when people dont believe, Macroevolution is a science and the scientific controversy is only about how those changes predominantly occur not that they dont occur. I cant remember ever turning on the TV and seeing non religious evolutionists bombing other countries, murdering people or instigating war because of beliefs
2006-10-03 19:44:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Aussieblonde -bundy'd 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
You seem to be misinformed. There is no evidence against evolution... after nearly 150 years. Oh... of course there a whole slew of phony, plausible-sounding and scientific-sounding lies, produced by creationists to manipulate the opinions of their scientifically ignorant constituency... but, to date, there is no genuine scientific evidence that contradicts evolution.
2006-10-03 19:51:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
There isn't any real evidence against it. There isn't any evidence for creationism or whatever they call it today, so creationists try to attack evolution. Even if one could disprove it, that wouldn't automatically prove anything else. This is a big flaw in their twisted illogic.
2006-10-03 19:47:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by miyuki & kyojin 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, they just laugh at the source. Do you feel smug when you hear of Intelligent Design? I can assure you that you would not like it if the world was thrown back to a 'Middle Ages' philosophy. Be careful what you wish for, it might come true.
2006-10-03 19:36:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by eantaelor 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Nope, partly because no one is pointing out evidence against it.
2006-10-03 20:56:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
How can you deny all the evidence for evolution?? Darwin's' theory isn't fiction!!! I really don't know what you mean by "macro-evolution". "Macro" means long or large-scale...I'm confused!
2006-10-03 19:43:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Only because we're so astounded by the depths of stupidity of the creationists and their so-called "evidence."
2006-10-03 19:35:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by John's Secret Identity™ 6
·
3⤊
4⤋
YES
2006-10-03 19:56:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Not perfect, just forgiven 5
·
1⤊
1⤋