With whom does the burden of proof rest?

Question

I am told quite often that an atheist should have to prove his own belief that a god does not exist before challenging another's belief that a god does exist. Doesn't math teach us that one cannot prove a negative? Should the scientific proof of a god be a burden to the believers, or to the atheists? Surely, it must rest with someone.

Answer 1

Atheism is logically correct as well as the only belief I am capable of. Makes sense to me.

Answer 2

You're redefining atheism. Atheism is a positive belief. Atheism says "God doesn't exist." So prove He doesn't exist. It's impossible for you, since you'd have to know all of time and space. Ppl try to redefine atheism to mean a lack of belief, but this is deceptive. Atheism is most definitely an active belief that asserts "God doesn't exist." If it weren't an active belief, atheists wouldn't combat Christianity.

So, prove God doesn't exist. It's impossible to do. I have the Bible which proves God does exist, so atheism is wrong. If He didn't exist, why did the disciples die for believing Jesus rose again when He must not have? And why did Paul become a Christian after getting paid to kill them? There's no logical reason for these things if God doesn't exist.

Although I should note, technically you can never scientifically prove anything, you can only disprove possibilities. The only way to prove something is to observe it, and when that happens, it becomes an observation, not a proof. Proofs exist only in mathematics.

Answer 3

It relies upon on what claims you're speaking about. Atheists and creationists are type of like apples and oranges. Atheism would not handle how existence differences through the years - you would possibly want to settle for or deny evolution and nevertheless be an atheist. Likewise, Creationism is the conception that each and every thing on earth develop into created as-is (some believe 6000 years in the past), and that enormous scale replace is basically no longer accessible, yet (a minimum of in the U. S.) that's only a sub-set of Christians that believe it. the burden of evidence lies on the only making a favorable declare. If we are speaking about evolution, then the burden of evidence is on those claiming that evolution is genuine (and through any clinical and rational regularly happening, that burden has been met 100 cases over). If we are speaking about the straightforward existence of God (and linked such issues as devil, angels, heaven, hell, and so on), then the burden of evidence is on those claiming that God exists. for sure, technology won't be able to come down one way or the different on that challenge (technology is the study of the organic international, even with the indisputable fact that the supernatural might want to be outdoors of the organic international), so that's typically a count number of conception.

Answer 4

You cannot prove a negative assertion, the burden of proof is always on the person making the positive claim. If I said that the third planet in the Alpha Proxima star system was covered with a three foot layer of French brie and told you to prove it wasn't, you wouldn't be able to even though the assertion is ridiculous.

Answer 5

You cannot prove god does or does not exist. There is no burden of proof, for the choice is faith and belief for either. However, there is an answer.

If science cannot show that life can be created naturally, then, the only remaining conclusion is that a creator was involved with creating the heavens and life. If science can show that life can occur naturally, then, the issue for God is deeply wounded.

Until this is resolved, and it is resolvable, then faith or lack of faith is an issue of faith.

Answer 6

You should be able to prove your positive assertion. Or at least it should be provable. To just say that God lives outside our regular dimensions is silly...now you have to prove that non-regular dimensions exist. A negative assertion is unprovable because, as Christians are eager to point out, you haven't looked everywhere, you can't look everywhere, and even if you could, what if God was down and to the East of the universe while you were up and to the West...plus...have you looked in all the non-regular dimensions? What atheists are saying, when they say that there is no God is that nobody can prove that there is a God. If anyone could prove it, then there'd be no question. It would just be a question of whether you were inclined to follow God or not. Christians want to just jump to the second question and have the first one be a 'given.'

Answer 7

Who's accusing who? I'm already convicted. If all the trees in the forest shouted, "God lives!" would you require them to prove it? I would declare their statement a miracle, and evidence of the supernatural. And people, not being so noble as a tree, proclaiming, "God lives!", are therefore an even more astounding miracle. The mere fact that a beast known as man has heard of God, is very strong evidence, and should at least suggest that all creation is testimony of God's magnificence.

But atheists, often would rather argue with an axe. If a tree is a poem, then a forest is epic. Listen to the leaves...falling...

Answer 8

Everyone has the burden of proof regarding his own beliefs - as far he want to convince others of the rationality of his beliefs. Whether he's a believer or an atheist.

Answer 9

We as believers are never told to prove His existence, but He did tell us to spread the gospel in all the lands, the belief of Him existing is up to you. If yo want scientific proof well you will probably die before you get that.

Answer 10

the burden of proof lies on theprson who claims something does exist. unless there is PHYSICAL proof that the item used to exist,( like a skeleton or fossil) then it is on the person who says it no longer does. Since there has never been any physical proof God actually did exist, I believe it is up to someone to prove He does now.

Answer 11

Trying to prove that god does not exist is like trying to prove that elves do not exist. It is impossible. However it's easy to prove that the notions that believers of God carry are flawed, and therefore the belief in God is made by people who believe in proved flaws. Like saying the people who believe in elves also believe the earth is a cube.