read the question..
2006-10-03 09:02:42 · 26 answers · asked by kristen♥ 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You may as well be asking why 1+1 equals 3.
2006-10-03 09:05:52 · answer #1 · answered by The Resurrectionist 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
People don't "believe in" evolution. They either accept it or choose not to. It's a fact that evolution has, and continues to occur. The only thing that is not certain is the processes by which it does so, and we have a pretty good picture of that process already.
The fact that you say the bible has more scientific evidence supporting it than evolution does makes it obvious that you don't know what you are talking about.
2006-10-03 10:03:52 · answer #2 · answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you are confused. There is no scientific evidence for the bible and a lot for evolution.
2006-10-03 11:18:52 · answer #3 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You know, the bible really doesnt have that much scientific evidence. Science got alot of scientific evidence. For example, scientist have discovered that Earth didnt just exist by itself, they have evidence. And what about dinosaures? They have evidence about dinosaures. But the bible is mostly written by witnesses etc. It doesnt really show evidence. Part of the bible could have been a made up story! You never know.
2006-10-03 09:12:18 · answer #4 · answered by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Uh... "The Bible" and "Evolution" aren't two opposing ideas. One is a theory, but the other is a book. And a book that doesn't even say anything about evolution one way or another.
The creation stories can't really be read literally, since there are two different versions in the Bible and the longer one contradicts itself. The point of the creation stories does not in any way contradict the idea of evolution. They actually work extemely well together, and support each other if both considered logically...
2006-10-03 09:09:06 · answer #5 · answered by enaronia 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What kind of evidence do you have to support the Bible?
Quotes from the same book?
You cant use the words of a book to prove that the stories in the said book are true.
What physical evidence do you have. Real hard evidence?
None. If you did the world would be a much different place
2006-10-03 09:07:01 · answer #6 · answered by wilchy 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Scientific evidence?
The earth is not the center of the universe, it is not flat nor does it stand on pillars, pi does not equal 3, beetles do not have 4 legs. I could go on and on but the point is the bible has no factual backing, scientific or otherwise.
2006-10-03 09:11:57 · answer #7 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Who told you that? What evidence do you have? I have countless examples of evolution in everyday life. You might as well say that there is more evidence that the Earth sucks than there is for the theory of gravitation.
(I know, bad example!)
2006-10-03 09:07:06 · answer #8 · answered by wizard8100@sbcglobal.net 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Because IF the Bible is right, we don't get to screw as much as we'd ike to.
Anyway, from reading so many Q&A on this subject, I've formed a theory:
Religions are like boogers. Everybody gets to pick their own.
That's your God-given RIGHT!
And everybody else has the God-given right to say they are either amused or disgusted by what they see you willingly swallow.
2006-10-03 09:09:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The bible has absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever!
2006-10-03 09:05:37 · answer #10 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋