The question comes off as judgemental, even though I hope it's not. When a government is "taken over" or created under a religious dogma, and a specific religious belief is endorsed by the government, it is necessary to stifle all others. You see, if a nation endorses Buddhism as the one true religion then allows christians to hang about exercising their beliefs, the feeling is that it weakens the argument that Buddhism is the one true religion. Happens the same way regardless of the religion, after all,
it wasn't that long ago that christian soldiers set forth on a mission to make the entire world a christian place and by god they were going to convert you or kill you. Part of it was called the crusades, but that wasn't the entirety. The middle east is still in the infancy of developing government that recognizes people as people and that they might have differing views. There are still christian crazies who believe that this country should be a christian nation and that christians are so discriminated against. How ridiculous when they control more than 70% of the world's wealth and are trying to run the most powerful country ever to exist. The idea that christians are persecuted more so than anyone else on earth is ludicrous. There is a fight everyday in this country between christians and our freedom of religion leaders to turn this country into a christian nation. It's my experience that christians want freedom not only to run things but to exclude things like Wiccan, or Buddhism, or Islam, or whatever.
2006-10-03 07:34:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ice 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
before each little thing Arabia isn't a united states of america.maximum Arabic international places have non secular freedom, assume for Saudi Arabia.when you consider that Turkey is a mundane united states of america, i imagine it really is the most tolerance in course of religion.confident Pakistan has regulations assisting non secular freedom,in spite of the indisputable fact that lots of them if no longer all of them aren't any more known by skill of the important circulation media. the quite a few wost beating in course of woman and not in any respect non secular persons happen in Pakistan, therefor i imagine Pakistan is the a lot less tolerance in course of non secular freedom. Persia is an Islamic united states of america, in spite of the indisputable fact that many Persians get excitement from living contained in the rustic. Iran isn't the perfect united states of america contained in the area,in spite of the indisputable fact that it honestly's better tolerance than Pakistan. you could't in any respect rank those international places properly. in accordance to my adventure, I easily have lived in 2 of those international places i imagine :::: a million) Turkey>>>maximum tolerance 2)Arabia 3)North Africa 4)Persia(Iran) 5)Pakistan
2016-11-26 00:54:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religious Freedom would mean giving power to the people....many countries do not want their populous to have that kind of power
2006-10-03 07:17:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by chico2149 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because all the jews and muslims in the middle east suck. fighting over religious BS. All those people suck and should be blown up.
2006-10-03 07:26:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Captain Trips 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not just the Middle-East.You say the Middle-East. Don't you mean anyplace that has a theocratic government?
2006-10-03 07:25:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shossi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The cultural and political traditions underpinning Western Civilization are not present.
2006-10-03 07:17:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because generally, Middle-Eastern governments are not democracies, but theocracies.
2006-10-03 07:18:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bob L 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
They have leaders that are children of Satan. If they were of God, they would be allowed to worship God.
2006-10-03 07:18:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by mesquiteskeetr 6
·
0⤊
2⤋