oh boy, no contest, wilderness! so nice and empty, no annoying people, just me and nature, cities do my head in, everytime I've been to london I have had a headache.
Good question! I think this one needs settling!
2006-10-03 06:35:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frax 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Wilderness
2006-10-03 13:33:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by tallerfella 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The wilderness is way better. You don't have to worry about people being a**holes, being robbed, raped, murdered, or anything else. In the wilderness, you can live in peace, without fear. It's always peaceful in the wilderness. The city is always hectic, and loud. So, definately, the wilderness beats out the city anyday.
2006-10-03 13:35:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by boyfriend_love_jessica 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Wilderness, with occasional trips to the city for Work!
2006-10-03 13:34:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by J. Charles 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The wilderness.
2006-10-03 13:33:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by By Your Command 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I lived my whole life in the middle of a big city (Philadelphia),and about 5 years ago I moved to Connecticut,still not quiet enough for me! So in a year or so,we're moving to New Hampshire in the middle of the woods up in the mountains! So I guess my answer would be wilderness!
2006-10-03 13:36:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Terri R 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I like both. The city is exciting. Each city has it's own aura and there is lots to do.
The wilderness is peaceful and majestic. A good break for the soul that is stressed from constant activity.
2006-10-03 13:35:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by newgirlnow 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I prefer cities on the edge of wilderness
2006-10-03 13:34:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by toietmoi 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
the city for shopping
the wilderness for relaxation from work, and stress
the country for living
2006-10-03 13:33:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by navymilitarybrat76 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wilderness. The lack of people makes it a better place.
2006-10-03 13:34:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by l8bucko 2
·
3⤊
0⤋