Why Did NATO Bombed Serbia?

Question

Bombing Serbia was nothing else than, raping one small country by a band(military union which consists of 19countries and 780million people against one small country with 10million citizens).It lasted 79days, throwing 23.000bombs and rockets during 36000 flights.
The "Clinton Doctrine"
"Bomb the civilians and the civilian structures until that country's military can't stand to watch it anymore." (Col. David Hackworth, one of America's most decorated soldiers)
justify this, and spare me Milosevic`s talks..
feel free to write about Kosovo, but first INFORM yourself
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo#Medieval
http://www.truthinmedia.org/truthinmedia/index.html

FRANKILN LD
please repeat your question, it`s not quite understandable.
if U ask do we have elected president,
after assassination of prime - minister Djindjic,
yes we do, now.

KNMARDIX as I said inform yourself first,it`s stupid to say that we killed Muslim(or Shiptar) citizen`s of Serbia, what you are saying is ignorance.
http://www.kosovo.net/history/kosovo_origins/ko_bibliography.html
http://www.kosovo.net/history/kosovo_origins/ko_chapter16.html

furthermore
http://www.savekosovo.org/default.asp?p=4
http://www.savekosovo.org/default.asp?p=4&leader=0&sp=125

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4665034215953475413&q=bombing+serbia

Answer 1

You see this kind of answers:
"Serbia was conducting a ethnic genocide, killing off all of the muslims in the country. "
That's totaly lie. I live in Serbia and have muslims friends in my neighbourhood. Noone ever said them bad word. And they still live here near me and other Serbs.
I must say again: Dont trust everything you see on TV. Speak with people in this country and you'll hear the truth. Only stupid people can belive in everything TV serves them.

Answer 2

As a former US Marine medic I was preparing to go into Bosnia on the ground Bill Clinton then president did not have the gall that it takes to fight the ground war that would have happened much like Iraq today. The fighting would be tougher because Bosnians would have fought harder than Iraquies. We were ready though. Instead we decided to utilize airpower to eliminate the supriority of the Serb. Tanks making it a more even fight for each side alowing Nato to step between the two fighting forces. Why step between? The world fears the spread of internal battles this is where WW I was began. Europe would not allow the fighting to continue for economic resons it was cheaper to blow up Serb forces insert Nato and put a stalemate to the the fighting there. I understand there has never been a elected leader of the country since that has not been assasinated is that true.

Answer 3

Serbia was conducting a ethnic genocide, killing off all of the muslims in the country. After having killed thousands of their own civilians NATO stepped in to prevent Serbia from conducting another Holocaust type disaster. Totally Justified.

I think its funny you call Col. David Hackworth the most decorated American Soldier. If he was the most decorated he would be a much higher rank then a Col.

Answer 4

How else stop a regime (apparantly supported by the people) of destroying the armenians- or was it albanians? in Kosovo.
Of course, Milosevic could've prevented the whole affair- but chose not to. Not until (Former-President) Martti Ahtisaari offered him a deal, commenting that the next one would be even worse if Milosevic still wouldn't agree.