I do not think you understand the theory of evolution. Evolution has 6 diffirent meanings.
1 Cosmic evolution- Where does matter, space and time come from?
2 Chemical evolution- Origan of higher elements than hydrogine.
3 Steller evolution- How did stars, moon ans sun form
4 Organic evolution- How did life start.
5 Macro evolution- How "kinds" of animal and plants evolved.
6 Micro evolution- How diffirent species evolved, but I think this one is more science, but what ever.
These 6 points make up evolution. Numbers 1-5 is theories, never proven by scientists to be true, number 6 is science, I do not have a problem with it, but with 1-5 I have a problem, and it seems to me you too. Go and do more studies on the first 5 points, and then come back and give your oppinion.
2006-10-02 23:29:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I'm sorry you're mistaken. Evolution does not consider origins. There are origin theories in science but they are not included in evolutionary theory. What you call Organic, Macro, and Micro evolution are all contained within the theory of evolution. The entire theory of evolution is good science with strong evidential support.
The other types of evolution you have described here are not part of what is commonly known as evolutionary theory. They also have much different meanings. Stellar evolution is simply the life cycle of a star, Chemical evolution explores how we came to have the variety of elements as well as abiogenisis which does in fact deal with life origins. I've never heard of cosmic evolution.
2006-10-03 01:55:35 · answer #1 · answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The theory of evolution is more related to animal and human form evolution. I do not feel that there is such a thing as Chemical evolution - chemicals do not 'evolve' - yes, many are man-made, some elements are man-made, but the periodic table of elements are known elements that exist.
I think Stellar evolution is cosmic evolution. Micro-evolution is related to the 'real' theory of evolution. I don't see how macro is different from MIcro evolution.
I do not understand what you mean by "Deadzone" however.
Look into Darwin's theories. He developed what has come to be known as the Theory of Evolution.
2006-10-03 06:35:55 · answer #2 · answered by Fun and Games 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If your a christian which this type of question shows That you not look and read your Bible the words will explain it all In geniuses God said let there be a heaven and earth and there was and it was done and it was good!let there be stars and the moon they will rule the night, there will be the sun blue sky they will rule the day . the night and day came the second day, and so on. this word evolution is just garbage for non believers to have nothing better to do but doubt the Bible and what God has done in seven days more than one man could ever do in a life time!
2006-10-03 07:24:19 · answer #3 · answered by clear morning 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Note how logically they are laid out by scientists and how Christians would come along and attribute everything to "God" and call it a day?
Thou neither of them may have the perfect answers now, one works to ask questions while the other explains everything away under an umbrella term of "God".
If that's not stupidity, what-else is? That's the whole point Atheists are making regarding the Bible and the irrational Christian teaching.
2006-10-03 06:44:31 · answer #4 · answered by : ) 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
a good book on plants is the secret life of plants peter tompkins an christopher bird,it opens your mind on organic evolution
Darwins theory on The power of movement of plants..
is in this book as is alot of case studys theorys that connect with Darwin to an other well knowns,
Heres a quote from the book ; Vogel:man can an does communicate with plant life plants are living objects,sesitive,rooted in space, they may be deaf and blind in the human sense,but there is no doubt in my mind that they are extremly sensitive instruments for measuring mans emotions,they radiate energy, forces that are beneficial to man....
LIKE THIS BOOK IS BIG its got lots of case studys etc.
Darwin he just worked out certain scientific theorys that add up to a certain degree an started the ball rolling, ive bee lucky also i got to see his exhibit it londons natural history,musum,
2006-10-03 07:02:08 · answer #5 · answered by GOOCH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The universe is eternal & infinite. "Life" is likewise eternal and is ubiquitous throughout the universe. "Life" is nothing more than energy in various configurations and everying is "alive."
There is no reason to invoke creation since the universe is eternal & infinite, it did not require creating.
"Nothing" does not and has never existed. And, never will.
The claim that a "creator" appeared out of "nothing" and began "creating" something from nothing is more juvenile than the Santa Claus or Easter Bunny tales.
2006-10-03 06:45:54 · answer #6 · answered by Left the building 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good points you have made. I don't claim to have the answers neither. LOL
I think the religion could be considered a "theory" as well. No one can really "prove" god exist. The bible don't prove it! There have been a few people on here brave enough to e-mail me on here and attempt to try to prove to me that god exist. They have failed and all of them gave up.
***Note to the person who answered below my answer..."Deadzone" is just a guys username on here. ****
2006-10-03 06:35:49 · answer #7 · answered by larrys_babygurl_4life 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pl. do me a favour. When you have the plausible answers, kindly share the knowledge with me via email
2006-10-03 06:37:52 · answer #8 · answered by hasanmuizudin 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem with any kind of evolution is that it takes God out of the mix.
2006-10-03 06:42:46 · answer #9 · answered by Preacher 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think deadzone must have missed understanding your evo question.
I ran across this, the fish guy is interesting.http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/home.php
2006-10-03 06:40:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋