which religion do you think has strong justification islam,christianity,?

Answer 1

Without doubt, it is Islam!
The revealed book Qu'raan is in its original form - no alterations, no amendments.
There is no doubt regarding the Prophet (Peace be upon Him) and the role he played as the Messenger of God.
Islam preaches monotheism, which the previous Prophets (Peace be upon them all) also preached.
There is NO original sin in Islam
Islam is a way of life.
Islam is perfect in every way!

Answer 2

Islam of course ^.^ Cause the Christianity that is being practiced today is one of the many 'evolved' forms of Christianity. The history of the Christian faith is so messed up and controversial. Its more like some Roman Emperor made up most of the Gospels. And the supposed authors of the Gospels did not even write them. The fact that the Bible keeps being revised and there is always some kind of new testament coming up shows that there is too much ambiguity in the whole thing. How much of the religion is actually Christianity and how much of it is man-made??!!
In the case of Islam, the Qur'an has remained unchanged. The religion and its teachings are the same. Every action has a reason for it and is explained in the Qur'an or by the sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW). Its more like a way of life where every detail of human life from what you should eat to social conduct to politics and science are all in the Qur'an. Islam is a perfect religion.

Answer 3

Definitely Islam

Answer 4

Christianity.

Answer 5

Islam has good justification.

Answer 6

Definitely Islam. Not trying to be bias but if you read & compare between Quran and Bible, then you will know. FYI, not a single word in Quran teach about violation.

Answer 7

I would rule out all the eastern religions whether we're talking about Buddhism or Hinduism or Taoism or whatever. All those religions are pantheism. Those religions are premised on the idea that the universe is eternal. It has always been here. Science itself has proven that wrong. The big bang is the start of the universe. It's the start of the 4 dimensions(3 dimensions of space and 1 dimension of time). About 95-98% of the scientist believe in the big bang. Either they're right and all the eastern religions are wrong or the eastern religions are right and the scientists are wrong. Take your pick. I'll go with the scientist since I don't see any reasons for believing in the eastern religions anyhow. That leaves christianity, judaism and islam.

Why not Islam?

Why not Islam? Because I don't believe Islam is a true revelation from God. Islam and Christianity disagree drastically. They both say they are coming from God. They can't both be true, not if they disagree. One of them has to be wrong. They disagree in many, many places. Let's just take one of those disagreements. Christianity says that Jesus Christ died 2000 years ago on a cross and that's written in their Holy book, the Bible which they say is coming from God. Islam says Jesus Christ did not die on a cross 2000 years ago and that's written in their Holy book the Koran(which they also say is coming from God). My question is, what actually happened 2000 years ago? You can't have it both ways. Either he did die on a cross or he didn't die on a cross. If he did then Islam is not a true revelation from God because Islam says he didn't die on a cross and it says that's coming fromGod(can God be wrong?). If he didn't die on a cross than christianity is wrong. Why should I believe Muslim scholars who came much later(1000 years later) over the apostles and writers of the New Testament who were either eye witnesses or they got it from eye witnesses(regardless, all of them lived during that time period). Also, the church fathers and early scholars of the church all testified that he died on a cross. Even extra biblical historians such as Tacitus, Suetonius, Pliny the younger, Josephus and other historians who lived during that time period have testified that Jesus died on a cross. Actually, the only historians that you'll ever find anywhere(religious or secular) who will say that Jesus didn't die on a cross are Muslim historians. If i'm reading an eye witness account of a speech that Richard the lion-hearted gave in about 1190AD and you come up to me and say "no, that's not what he said.....let me tell you what he really said". My answer to you is going to be "why should I believe you over him....he was an eye witness.........you came along 900 years later".
The idea that the scriptures were changed as they were copied is also bogus. The dead sea scrolls proved that. Before we found the dead sea scrolls in 1947 the oldest copy of the book of Isaiah was from about 1100AD. In the dead sea scrolls we found a copy of Isaiah that was copied in the year 100BC(1200 years
earlier). Now we could compare the 2 scrolls and see how many errors were made in 1200 years of copying. The 2 scrolls were 99.5% the same. In 1200 years of copying there was only 19 letters(not words) that were different. Remember, the book of Isaiah was a big book that had 66 chapters and it had only 19 letters different after 1200 years of copying. None of those letters changed the meaning of the book in any way. These guys didn't make errors. This was not just any book. In their eyes, it was the word of God. There were curses attached to people who changed it in any way. Besides, the guys who copied it were professional scribes. They did this for a living.
How do the Muslims explain these differences between the bible and the Koran? They say (against all evidence) that the christians and the jews deliberately corrupted the bible. I've already shown you why that isn't true.
That leaves Christianity or Judaism. Personally I think they're basically the same religion. The main difference is that both of them talk of a Messiah. The jews are still waiting for their Messiah. The christians say that they shouldn't be waiting because their Messiah has already come. His name was Jesus. They just didn't recognize him(but they will someday, the bible makes that clear and, in fact, many of them already have....they call themselves Messianic jews). I just don't see how you can read passages like Micah 5:2, Isaiah 9:6, Isaiah chapter 53, Isaiah 7:14,Zechariah 9:9,Zech. 11:12,13,Psalms 22:1,6-8,14-18,
Zech. 12:10,Psalms 16:9,10 and not see that Jesus was that Messiah.
There are other reasons why I believe Christianity is the truth.
The Bible has the signature of God attached to it in many ways. One of those ways is Bible prophecy. The old testament has 333 prophecies about the first coming of Jesus Christ and 456 specific details about his life(all written between 400 and 200 years before he was born). The 4 gospels in the new testament(Mathew, Mark, Luke & John) tell the story of jesus. Had those 4 gospel writers chosen to not write their gospels, we could still have re-created the whole life of Christ just from the old testament(all written before he was born). In fact, that is how the christians preached the gospel in the first 20-30 years arter the death of christ. They preached it from the old testament because the new testament had not yet been written. Man sees history like a person sees the Rose Parade sitting in the stands. The floats that have already gone by him are like the past. The floats in front of him are like the present. The floats still coming are like the future. These prophets in the old testament who wrote about Jesus Christ seemed to be able to see history the way you would see the Rose Parade from a helicopter. They seemed to be able to see the end from the beginning. That tells me that though they were writing these things down the info was not ultimately coming from them but from a higher source because man simply doesn't see history that way. Also, the bible has amazing knowledge about many scientific principals long before these principals were discovered. Seventeen times in the old testament the bible says that God is "stretching the heavens". For thousands of years bible scholar struggles with what that could possibly mean. Then in 1929 Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe was expanding. The bible told us that long ago.
No other religion or Holy Book has this king of knowledge. All this tells me that these prophets in both the old and new testament were not nutcases but true prophets of God.

http://www.intouch.org/index_76034.html
http://www.tektonics.org/
http://www.ankerberg.com/
http://www.answersingenesis.org/
http://www.answering-islam.org/

Answer 8

Islam for sure. Just compare the two scripture - check out which is God's word. Look for error in both and compare then you will agree with me

Answer 9

Depends on what you are trying to justify doesn`t it . I seems a bit silly to ask this question considering that most answering the question will base thier answer on the morales ingrained in them by thier own religion .Its always going to get a biased answer .

Answer 10

satanism.
its the opposite of christianity!
so it should strong justification =)