2006-10-02 17:45:44 · 18 answers · asked by HAMIDON K 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ TVs
- Plasma TVs are the current size champions, particularly when comparing TVs that consumers can easily purchase. LCDs are catching up in size with their developing technology, however, and may surpass Plasmas in the near future. This may be due to difficulties in producing glass large enough for larger plasmas.
- LCD TVs have the advantage of Viewing Angle, but by a small margin. Your viewing experience is not going to be ideal at 160 or 175 degree angles. LCD TVs used to have a problem in this area, primarily because LCDs were originally used as single person computer monitors.
- Plasma TVs can suffer from burn-in produced by static images. After extended periods, stationary images "burn in" and produce an after-image ghost which remains permanently on the screen. LCD don't have this problem.
- LCD TVs were originally designed for data display, and not video. Therefore refresh rates had to be improved. LCD TVs with refresh rates below 16 ms or lower (5-15 ms) show very few noticeable artifacts. LCD TVs are now available with refresh rates as low as 5ms. Slight edge to Plasma
- Product Life-span for both Plasma and LCD should more than adequately satisfy most consumers. The average CRT TV (the kind most of us have at home) has a half-life of around 25,000 hours. If the average American household watches an average of four to six hours of television a day, even a 30,000 hour lamp would give you over 16 years of use. By then you'll be enjoying your new 'Holodeck.'
- LCD TVs are considerably lighter, more portable, and cheaper to ship.. Which means Plasma is heavier.
- LCD TV are far less fragile than Plasmas
- Both LCD and plasma TVs will meet the brightness expectations of most consumers. However, in 'real world' situations with ambient light, LCD TVs will generally look a little brighter.
- LCD very difficult to produce deep blacks. Advantage to Plasma.
- LCDs TVs are just a bit thinner.
- LCD TVs are not affected by high altitudes but Plasma does.
2006-10-02 17:59:41 · answer #1 · answered by bk78451 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Based on the latest comparison test between LCD and plasma, due to the fact that plasma screens have better contrast ratio, the experts picked plasma over LCD.
Having said that, most people probably don't notice the difference in the black levels. If you like what you see, you buy what you like, not because someone told you to.
2006-10-02 19:08:39 · answer #2 · answered by errant_hero 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LCD gives a higher quality image and also lasts longer than your sstandard Plasma TV, however, I find that the High Definitions, whether it be LCD or Plasma are both outstanding.
2006-10-02 17:47:49 · answer #3 · answered by kittycat_cc14 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My research says plasma "picture" is by far better, but it is still in the new "work out the kinks" stage. It is more expensive than LCD, because it is newer technology, and some reports say that plasma screens fade over time (that is one of the kinks" and it will need to be perfected.
2006-10-02 17:49:57 · answer #4 · answered by Emma 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plasmas burn something and dont final fairly as long and can start to have black spots everywhere in the exhibit whilst the photograph producing undertaking runs out.. LCDs are only like computing gadget monitors so as that they final for an prolonged time.. Plasmas are patently sharper and clearer than LCds. plasmas value greater too..
2016-10-01 21:16:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the debate will continue to rage because of peoples personal preferences-so i put it down to this simple equasion-under 37" then lcd would be my choice the picture quality is better than plasma and plasma tv's do not do justice to themselves below this size-37" and over then it has to be plasma because they have the superior picture quality (especially in hd form) and there is none of the trailing and smearing apparent in the larger lcd sets-though lcd are not far behind and catching up fast in these stakes.
2006-10-02 22:30:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
plasma tvs have a shelflife of about 7 years before they burn out. lcds maintain the picture for so much longer. For the money, go with the lcd.
2006-10-02 17:53:12 · answer #7 · answered by David 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never had a plasma but I think they would take up less room and would be able to be mounted on that wall like a picture. Why don't you go for a small one for your bedroom before you decide on a larger one for the main living area?
2006-10-02 17:48:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plasma TV's are undoubtedly the better in quality. However, they are immensely more expensive than LCD's.
2006-10-02 17:48:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, but I like my LCD and wouldn't trade it for a plasma.
2006-10-02 20:33:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋