English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would they have to move out of their trailers?

2006-10-02 11:59:46 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

18 answers

Well, lets see, this could pose a problem for future republican voting. No check in the mail could mean a choice between cable TV and food. If food wins out, no Fox news.

No Fox news may mean folks getting exposed to real facts. That may lead to citizens making choices in the voting booths on their own sense of what is right and wrong.

I see nothing but chaos, since so many are not accustomed to voting their own values. It could lead to honor and belief in the Constitution for crying out loud!

2006-10-02 13:12:59 · answer #1 · answered by navymom 5 · 1 2

Really funny of how many Republicans
have answered this in favor of their party.
Guess none of them have ever been in
the South (RED STATES) where the common
place to live (Cheapest also) is trailers!

Lived in Tennesse and South Carolina for years
and houses are scarce and trailers are a common
place to live for rednecks...

2006-10-02 19:17:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

The majority of welfare recipients (78%) have no party affiliation and do not participate in the voting process.

You're inane question has a basis in truth, a majority of welfare recipients who live in trailers ( your reference for rednecks) do indeed live in "red" states, however most welfare is recieved by inner city residents who live in government sponsored housing and the vote from those areas most generally is heavily democrat.

The real question is for you: Do you live in a toolbox or are you a homeless tool?

2006-10-02 19:10:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Republicans using welfare and foodstamps? I'd like to see that happen!

2006-10-02 19:06:28 · answer #4 · answered by Bub 2 · 1 3

NO THEY WOULD RUN FOR AN OFFICE IN THE GOVERNMENT AND BECOME MILLION AIRS. LOOK AT LAMAR ALEXANDER FROM TN AS AN EXAMPLE NOT TO MENTION ALL THE REST OF THE RICH ONES.

2006-10-02 19:05:54 · answer #5 · answered by roy40372 6 · 1 1

No the Democrats would have to move out of their trailers, they are the welfare party not Republicans, dumbass. And everybody knows that. and they are the party that support deviant life styles.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16450

2006-10-02 19:07:16 · answer #6 · answered by hexa 6 · 1 4

Democrats rely on welfare,not republicans.You must be a "newly arrived immigrant".

2006-10-02 19:07:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

It wouldn't make any difference. Liberals are the only ones who survive off of welfare and foodstamps.

2006-10-02 19:01:42 · answer #8 · answered by Pancakes 7 · 6 4

It wouldnt amount to much.
Cause most Republicans believe in personal responsibilty.
Not in the liberal mantra of "I have a right to"

2006-10-02 19:02:36 · answer #9 · answered by scary g 3 · 6 3

There are no Republicans drawing welfare.

It's a "Democrat Thing".

2006-10-02 19:05:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers