2006-10-02 11:07:47 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
i think you wanted us to think we evolved from you
2006-10-02 11:08:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question! However, some people look like their pets whether the pet is a cat or a dog or some other species. Mr. Darwin presented his THEORIES while they were still half-baked. To this day no one has been able to find the so called "Missing Link".
Sure the "scientific" community has and continues to find FAKES that some people want to pass on as authentic but after unbiased scrutiny these artifacts have been revealed to be hoaxes.
Some would prefer to believe a lie and tout it as truth in order to keep from giving credit to the almighty creator!
Ask Darwin: "Which came first the chicken or the egg, and show proof of your results. Time allowed 100 years." ~Time's up!
2006-10-02 18:22:04 · answer #2 · answered by vJ 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It had nothing to do with the fact that you were a gifted scientist. It was because you looked like a monkey. And God probably made you look like a monkey because you didn't believe in her.
2006-10-02 18:10:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is as real as sun.However there is tricky part that some "did" evolved but some stayed monkey or lower than that as we can see among behing Bush administraton.Anyway they will become human I hope...onday before they started III.WW.They may not resemble monkeys and may stand on two legs but what they believe is inhuman for sure...
2006-10-02 18:31:12 · answer #4 · answered by 141zero 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not A MONKEY but An APE! You gonna make all the atheists mad.
=0P
2006-10-02 18:11:55 · answer #5 · answered by Pashur 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's proven. Don't you people read anything?
It's said that Human DNA is only 2-5% different then a monkeys....
2006-10-02 18:09:44 · answer #6 · answered by thankgodformaryjane 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
May be Adam was a monkey.
2006-10-02 18:08:55 · answer #7 · answered by observer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We look a lot more like monkeys than we do horses or manatees.
2006-10-02 18:27:51 · answer #8 · answered by Chris J 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Now that we have studied DNA, you know you are wrong.
1.It is impossible for an organism to add DNA to it's offspring for it 's benefit.
2.Organisms which out wardly appear to be related are not on the genetic level.
3.There is more from genetic studies of frogs and fish here at http:www.reasons.org/resources/fff/2000issue04/index.shtml
2006-10-02 18:26:50 · answer #9 · answered by created 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
everyone/everything looks like a monkey even carmen elctra and snakes and books
2006-10-02 18:09:28 · answer #10 · answered by bsktballchik 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it was because I thought about things rather than believing in a fairytale!
2006-10-02 18:11:12 · answer #11 · answered by King_Nelson_Brilliant 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋