English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-02 10:56:53 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

27 answers

They can't

2006-10-02 10:58:15 · answer #1 · answered by Atheist Eye Candy 5 · 3 1

If there were no other evidences against evolution, this one alone would destroy it. Venus and Pluto are spinning backward to the way that centrifugal force would dictate if the big bang theory were correct. 6 planets have moons orbiting backwards, and Neptune, Saturn and Jupitar have moons orbiting in both direction.

If the Universe is billions of years old, there should not be any space dust. In 1955, scientists predicted that Moon dust might be several miles deep. Huge landing pads were put on the spacecraft for the moon landing so that it would not sink into the dust. In fact it was found that the dust on the Moon was about ½ inch deep only, suggesting a young Moon. Dust actually gathers at the rate of 2.7 inches per million years.

The sun is moving away from the earth. Taking into effect the distance of the sun away from the earth now, the rate at which it is moving, and the Hubble constant (a mathematical expression which says that the further away an object is from Earth, the faster it’s moving away from us), if the universe is millions or even billions of years old, the sun would touch the earth.

The moon is also moving away from the earth. Using the same method, if the universe were millions of years old, the proximity of the moon to the earth would cause massive tidal activity, flooding the earth everyday. The earth would be incapable of sustaining life.

At the equator the Earth is travelling at about 1000 miles per hour. The Earth slows down by 1/1000 second per day.
Leap seconds are added every 18 months. If the Earth is only 6000 years old there is no problem. If the Earth is billions of years old – that is a major problem, because...
Earth would then have been spinning much faster!
Days and nights would have elapsed much faster!
Centrifugal force would have been a big problem.
The winds would have been at least 5000 miles per hour.

There are many other evidences that point away from evolution and to a intelligent creation.

In conclusion, tell me this is not circular reasoning.

I was told in school that the age of the fossils is determined by the period of the layers they are contained in (jurrasic, precambrian, etc)
I was also told the period of the layers is determined by the fossils that are contained in them.

The world is being duped by a fantastic, but untrue story.

Hope this helps!

Booyakasha!

2006-10-02 11:14:28 · answer #2 · answered by Reasoner 2 · 0 1

If you do go to Kent Hovind's website you will see a section that offers $250,000 to anyone who has any scientific evidence of evolution. If there was any hard evidence for evolution then why does this offer still stand?

Did you know Hitler said if you tell a lie loud enough and long enough people will start to believe it. Well the reason many people believe in evolution is because they were told that this (evolution) is how the world got started.

Just a side note, I was not raised in a Christian home. So I have heard all the same lies you have about how the world got started. But I took a chance and asked the God of the bible to be Lord of my life and He did.

I figured what the Heck, if God is not real than nothing in my life will change.

2006-10-02 11:13:28 · answer #3 · answered by ice 2 · 0 1

That's one of the biggest problems with the theory of evolution. There have been no misssing links. The few they had supposed found were proved to be false. Like the extinct pig tooth that they said was an early ape man. Or the dinosaur bird that until a few years ago was found to be a hoax. There is no place on earth where you can find the geological column. All is futher proof why Creationism is the only thing that makes sense.
It proves Evolution as being a faith (religon) only for those who refuse to believe in God.

Belief in God may not makes sense to you but it makes ever more sense than evolution. No one can argue with that.

2006-10-02 11:10:48 · answer #4 · answered by Answer King 2 · 0 1

Evolution go hand in hand with the Big Bang theory, things such happened.

Have you ever noticed how beautiful the color green of new grass is, or how beautiful the sky is, whether it's blue with white clouds, or dark gray just before the rain and speaking of the rain, have you noticed how water feels when it touches your skin.

While we are on the subject of the elements, let's talk about air, you think it just happen to be here and one of main elements we living creatures need to survive?

Eyes to see, Ears to hear, fingers to feel, nose to smell, a tongue to taste, legs to walk, arms to hug, you think this just happened?

Nothing Just Happen!

In Genesis, the first book of the Bible, It say God created and we Christains believe, not just because we want to believe or God asked us to believe, but just by looking around not only at the things mentioned above, but by so much more.

We Christains don't have to prove Evolution wrong, Evolution has already proven itself wrong.

NOTHING JUST HAPPENS!

2006-10-02 11:34:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think Christians can "prove evolution wrong" without evidence that directly conflicts with the theory.

It works both ways, though... non-Christians cannot prove God doesn't exist. Not really a related question, but that is where my head went when you asked. :)

2006-10-02 10:59:58 · answer #6 · answered by stillstanding 3 · 2 0

They can't and they know that. Personal faith can't prove a scientific theory wrong. They use words like "intelligent design" to make themselves sound credible, but in reality their "evidence" against evolution is merely blind faith.

2006-10-02 11:21:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i think of it rather is because of the fact human beings hear the way evolution is defined and consider it as performing. Evolution would not act to make adjustments in species, even nonetheless it rather is a depiction of how species exchange to evolve to circumstances. Any farmer can enable you realize approaches it works because of the fact they hire the common thought to reproduce traits into livestock and vegetation.

2016-10-15 11:01:57 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

In order for evolution to be a fact it must be an on going process. We would have to see it, phase thru phase.

BTW, Darwin never mentioned the word evolution in his Book.

2006-10-02 11:04:20 · answer #9 · answered by Royal Racer Hell=Grave © 7 · 0 1

You cannot prove a negative.

Also, the below reference links will be plenty to disprove the theory.

2006-10-02 11:19:51 · answer #10 · answered by TK421 5 · 0 0

As long as evolution is a theory, the ball is in your court to prove

2006-10-02 11:00:07 · answer #11 · answered by Slave to JC 4 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers