Hitler made two mistakes.
He encouraged the Japanese to attack the US and he invader Russia. He would have had all of EU in his hands had he not done those two things. If he would have stopped with most of EU and then reinforced over several years, he would have been extremely hard to defeat.
2006-10-02 07:19:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Q-burt 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
No No No!!!
The core of Hitler's design for the world was that the Teutonic, Aryan race was the superior form of humanity in the world. It was therefore their manifest destiny to conquer and rule over the rest of mankind. To this end, they must first migrate to their original homeland in order to gain Lebensraum: living space. Unfortunately this was not Germany, but roughly the Ukraine. From there the Aryan race would breed and expand to fulfil their destiny.
If the Aryans were the master race, then there must of been inferior races. The Slavs were one such race: polluted and interbred with Asiatic blood (Hitler goes on a lot about blood purity). Russia was the home of the Bolsheviks. The Slavs were only fit for slavery.
In Hitler's eyes there was one race that was so vile and degenerate that they could not even hold onto territory. Instead they spread throughout the rest of humanity, living as a parasite upon their hosts. These were the Jewish people, and he marked these out for the Final Solution. Gypsies also held this dubious distinction.
Now, does ANY of that sound like the right idea to you or anybody else who is reading this? If it does sound good, please don't contact me.
2006-10-09 10:43:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by 13caesars 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Up to a point I can understand the logic, but he didn't research it NEARLY enough.
There is not and has never been to my knowledge any evidence that the Aryan race are/were in any way superior to any other race. If there was, there would at least have been some grounds for debate BUT...
In attempting what he did, he also left out one of humankind's greatest strengths, that being compassion. Even if Aryans WERE superior to other people, the act of eradicating others erodes that quality.
More so, I quite like the cultural diversity we have and wouldn't want to lose it, even given all the troubles in the world at the moment.
2006-10-02 08:15:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mr A Hitler, Mr J Stalin, Mr P Pot and a fair few others have had the same idea ~ each with variations on the general theme.
Good ideas though they were were, they really upset an awful lot of people who paid the price - without the Choice or a Contract of any sort for these Ideal Ideas....
with their own Lives.
Just How would you like to be Informed that You have just been Joined as a member into this Great new Political plan of endevour, this Life Changing Venture for a Better World
without being asked! And, what is more, without being told just Who Will Pay the Bill, or How it will be Paid?
Sash
2006-10-02 07:29:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Well he wasn't the only one with the idea - lots of politicans and people both sides of the atlantic at the time thought he was doing a good thing. They naturally denied it later.
Superior beings - is the idea which lead USA to Nuc Japan etc etc Remember Jesse Owens was not acknowleged by the President of The USA after winning in Hitlers Germany.
2006-10-10 05:48:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by yscrk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
or you could say is history repeating itself which is what i`ve been thinking for a long time, there are a lot of Americans and some English who are being caught up in a tidal wave of hate .For there own sake they should read about how Hitler turned a nation of good people into something that could condone the holocaust.before they have to live with the shame for generations . Any jews who condone what is happening in the world now,shame on you
2006-10-10 01:40:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by keny 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
this is such a double edged sword. As it is still recent history. Genghis Khan / Julius Cesar / Alexander are considered in history as great leaders who ruled with an iron fist. Yet in their own times they were seen as tyrants. Wanting a better society for your own kind is not wrong but if it is at the cost of persecuting others for being different then yes it is wrong. If we take away the extremes of Hitler's rule then his path for a modern strong and proud country is correct. Very difficult question.
2006-10-04 04:38:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see why you might ask this question. A couple of points need making-
1. Hitler was not alone in what happened in ww2 he had a large backgound staff of Generals etc. It was not necessisarly hes idea to kill millions of innocent people.
2.How many people since ww2 have been killed in europe because of racial hate , religion and general disslikes of different types of people. DID WE LEARN ANYTHING???
3.We can not even unite Europe now the Dutch dont like the Germans , Spanish dont like the French and nobody likes us English - not even the Scots,Welsh and the Irish.
So wehy do we want to change anything just leave well allone and let us all live in peace.
In answer to your question i think Hitler ended up as a mad psychopath who wanted all the power he could get hes hands on.So no i do not think he was right.
2006-10-02 07:32:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stevie G 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I do not know about anyone, as I am sure you will find some that think Adolph was right, but I DO NOT. Hitler was a very mentally ill individual and but for the grace of God, he would have had the opportunity to try to make that "perfect" world.
2006-10-02 07:12:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
this happens regularly, highly if the couple is youthful and only taking off out of their lives and careers. Assuming the gap is tremendous and the time, like college or a clean pastime, is only as tremendous, it really is extremely asking to a lot, to assume the like to very last. Married human beings get divorced each and each of the time, and they stay aspect by skill of aspect, which of direction, stands out as the reason behind the divorce. lol different couples chop up up, love regrettably, for most human beings, isn't eternal, yet regularly fleeting. besides the actual shown reality that at the same time as we are in love, we've self belief it to be so. all of us choose employer and companionship, and human beings on the purpose human beings. In lengthy distance, you could continually stay in contact, presently, yet you nonetheless choose some particular man or woman on your life, till you ought to stay at living house, with a good e book or television etc. no longer the fashion to spend ones life.
2016-11-25 22:48:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by orson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No he was an certifiably mad ,evil, murderer and a dictator - oh and by the way he murdered people who he considered mentally defective - for example those who could not spell properly.
Whatever you believe even if this is a Devil's advocate question it is unacceptable to in any way ask if people can justify the Holocaust. That is like asking if the WTC terrorists had the right idea, how offensive do you think that is? Well in Europe your question is just as offensive.
Think before you post in future.
2006-10-02 07:28:45
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋