You are right. He is the bravest president ever. He's not afraid to do what is best for this country. It's funny how people from other countries can see how wonderful he is but all people do here is whine and complain. People complain that the election was rigged and yet say the president is stupid. Give me a break. I think these people just need to be hugged more.
2006-10-02 05:02:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
4⤊
4⤋
Dubya is by far and away the worst president the United States has ever had. However, he was elected by a majority of Americans in 2004 (having been handed the presidency by the Supreme Court in 2000 despite having lost that election). Those Americans with the ability to realise that the United States needs other countries cannot stand Bush.
2006-10-02 06:08:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Like him" Is not exactly a good word my friend. We got screwed these last election. In the first one he seemed like a good peacetime canidate who supported a number of good programs. last time we were given idiots to choose, and Bush was the lesser of two evils.
I mean, look at Kerry. The guy is STILL whining about his loss. He based his entire campaign on the faults of bush's administration, not his own political planning.
I support his war on terror. I think it's an issue that the world powers should have stepped on sooner. While i don't support his initial reasoning for going into Iraq(should have done his homework better first) I think the change to a politcal nation could do a lot to help stablize the region, as long as the American people can manage to hold on to some sort of resolve and put the ghost of Vietnam behind us it can work.
I have mixed feelings on the president. But i kinda wonder about the future of the USA under the next generation of canidates, some of them seem like guppies too.
But who am i to say? i'm only a teenage college student.
2006-10-02 04:36:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by jorlwind 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
corruption is the answer. oil is the answer. his father being former head of C.I.A. is the answer. bussiness links with the Arabs is the answer. Like 99% of all politicians he is there to line his own pockets, the trade off being he can be bought. If he is so good at being a world leader then why has he cut pay to the soldiers. Why are more than 30% of Americans illiterate. The truth is that the Media is controlled by the very wealthy and without Bush doing their bidding they would be making less profits. He is very clever at hoodwinking the USA public but outside the states he is a bit of a joke. We also have been conned with Tony Blair, so dont feel too bad.
2006-10-02 04:32:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because Dumb people are allowed to vote and there is a majority of dumb people in the United States. Why, just look at some of the questions & answers on here.
2006-10-02 08:22:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Didn't the Democrat vote get split when Bush first ran, because Ross Perot also ran & took voters from Al Gore ? Even then, it took some chicanery in Florida (run by Dubya's brother).
Second time around, 9/11 helped him look like the strong man.
2006-10-02 04:04:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Well, said Alberto 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I asked myself the same thing after his re-election.
Blame it on the democrats for having such a weak candidate. People chose between two wrongs.
2006-10-02 04:15:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
yes he was voted in. It was the same thing with Hitler. People wonder how he came to power, well, he was voted in and won a massive majority by the socialist worker parties. Most of the aristocrats and toffs didnt like him and many were executed for trying to get rid of him. In Bush's case, he won because he had a fair percentage but then there WAS that bit of bother wasnt there with re-counts and re-counts until he was declared the winner!
2006-10-02 04:10:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
I don´t think W is a bad person, just not very bright. He shoots first and asks questions later, and makes awful speeches. His command of English is poor, and he cannot get across his points well without labouring them. He relies on his advisors too much, and has promoted lots of indifferent people to high office. He should listen to what his generals are saying, and get out of the Middle East NOW, and leave them to their own devices.
2006-10-02 04:06:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by john r 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
The American people didn't put Bush there is was the powers that be that put him there. Have you never heard of the Free masons. Tony Blair has????
2006-10-02 07:29:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋