Check this out.
http://pewresearch.org/obdeck/?ObDeckID=36
2006-10-02 03:08:13 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
We'd like some over here first!
2006-10-02 03:14:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The need to spread democracy is important to the perception of human rights, effective governments, the obliteration of totalitarianism. Anything short of a working democracy is harmful to the well-being of a country. Australia, Britain, Germany, France, are but a few democratic governments who show this.
2006-10-02 03:29:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Like Skippy peanut butter on Wonder Bread with Welches Jelly!
Like Kraft Real Mayonase.
Like French's Mustard.
Like Johnson's Wax
2006-10-02 03:11:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
files have shown that mature republics (democracies can only artwork with small, homogeneous communities) infrequently warfare on one yet another. in spite of the indisputable fact that, new republics are better liable to warring with their acquaintances yet one can't get to a mature republic devoid of starting to be a clean one. at the same time as the rustic/UN encounters a united states of america it really is liable to make warfare or help terrorists that negatively impact the international economic equipment (which also skill each and each united states of america's safe practices), first international kin individuals is tried to get them to regulate to how the international feels they ought to behave. If that would not artwork, regularly protection stress stress is resorted to. each united states of america has an legal responsibility to insure its human beings can stay appropriately and not in any respect have their economic equipment (lives) disrupted so, certain, the US has a suitable to create new republics to insure it and/or it really is allies safe practices. The question extremely is, is it the perfect way? Can international places that are deeply divided alongside ethnic, cultural, or non secular strains prosper as a republic? to date, the answer has been a sturdy no. perpetually, they dissolve into smaller international places that play interior of sight diplomatic video games and wars for a upward push in relative potential and could be used by skill of different higher interior of sight powers for his or her own progression. regularly cases, it really is optimum proceed the stress, use protection stress stress only at the same time as there is an option authorities accessible, and help them hostile to the former one. in the different case, the recent regime will be worse then the former one. Sadam banked in this. His important worry became Iran and he theory the US would not in any respect attack and replace his regime because it became secular. regrettably for Iraq, he purposely gave the effect that he had guns of mass destruction to discourage Iran and became so secretive about the reality, that his own generals did not recognize it became a ruse till a briefing after the second one Iraq warfare began. This surfaced time and time again at the same time as his generals were interrogated and he himself admitted it. for this reason very nearly the total international believed Iraq to be a probability and triggered the attack.
2016-11-25 22:24:15 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm missing your point.
The Mexican election seems to have been pretty clean. Mind you, historic elections in Mexico meant that there were international observers of this one, something we have never felt necessary here. That should put people's minds to rest, but tell that to Obrador.
What is your question?
2006-10-02 03:13:57 · answer #5 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With the fraudulent 2000 elections (and especially after the 2004 elections), democracy in the US is dead. No US efforts to spread it anywhere else have any credibility.
2006-10-02 03:13:51 · answer #6 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
An opinion (like you claim to have) Is one that comes from your own thoughts, you appear to copy and paste all your opinions from newspaper articles. That means nothing.
BTW your avatar looks like John Wayne Gacey look him up maybe you have something in common.
2006-10-02 05:52:36 · answer #7 · answered by debra_har 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Spread democracy....hell were trying to keep democracy!
2006-10-02 03:11:52 · answer #8 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No really do not. That would be the "do gooders" in our government. I couldn't give a sh^t less who has a democracy or not.
2006-10-02 03:19:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
not all of us care if anyone else has democracy...our commitment is to retaining democracy in our own country... too bad the illegals don't have a commitment to their countries, huh?
2006-10-02 04:41:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋