I posted this question:
Do you find these 2 things similar?
Not all Muslims are terrorist, but all terrorist were Muslim.
Not all Homosexuals are pedophiles, but All pedophiles are homosexual.
The removed this question twice. Its a valid question.
2006-10-02 02:35:30 · 14 answers · asked by ? 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Becasue they suck, and no one here has a sense of humor.
2006-10-02 02:38:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
man, i answered questions with more PC than you have just shown, and they deactivated my whole yahoo account, all the mail and photos and stuff ive had for years gone. As for your question, the two things you compare are similar, but only as incorrect anologies or inductions. By incorrect i mean that there are a other terrorists than muslimes, and some pedophiles may like little girls.
2006-10-02 09:44:28 · answer #2 · answered by rand a 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First off not all terrorist are muslim, two names, Eric Robert Rudolph and Tmothy McVeigh.
Second, there are plenty male of pedos that like girls, I am not hip with names on any of them famously but i have a friend in jail right now that was that way and nobody knew.
Third, the right to free speech doesn't include the rght to ba taken seriously or to be heard in a certain forum. You can write a book but that doesn't mean Doubeday or Random House has to publish it. Yahoo is a company with standards they wish to uphold. While it is your right to express yourself and speak freely it is not your right to do it here. My advice get a server and start your own website.
2006-10-02 09:42:18 · answer #3 · answered by bullybrian2000 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
All pedophiles are not homosexual. Also, not all terrorists are Muslim, so your logic is faulty and statements over-generalized
There are hetrosexual preditors and non muslim terrorists.
You need to read the terms of service.
Questions that are blanket insults against a type of people is a VIOLATION... you can not post insults discuised as question.
try reading the TOS and then REFRAME your inquires so that they can be made acceptable to the TOS.
It looks like you are trying to bait them into banning you. Is that your goal? ??
2006-10-02 11:26:49 · answer #4 · answered by ??IMAGINE ?? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither statement is true. There are non-Muslim terrorists, and there are non-homosexual pedophiles. It's your exaggeration that makes people want to flag your question as hate-mongering.
But your *point* is true. The majority of terrorists are Muslims. Islam is intrinsically violent and oppressive, despite the protestations of its apologists. Muslim terrorists are acting not *against* the tenets of their faith but *in conformity* with them. Those who offer Qur'anic quotations which suggest that Islam is a peaceful, tolerant religion are engaging in subterfuge -- they aren't telling you that all those early verses were *abrogated* by later verses enjoining violent proselytism, and every classical school of Islamic jurisprudence agrees. Further, Islam is by its nature incapable of the sort of self-criticism that has led, in the west, to the rise of liberal religion, pluralism, and freethought. Muslim scholars who even suggest that the Qur'an and Sunnah be subjected to the sort of scholarly criticism applied by Christian scholars to their own texts live in fear for their lives. The Muslim press constantly publishes the most outrageous and vile anti-Semitic trash, and Muslims riot when the most delicate humor is applied to their so-called prophet. Make no mistake: they want to take over the world by any means necessary. So keep up the good fight. Just rethink the precise phrasing of your questions a little.
2006-10-02 09:43:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Your question may be valid, your logic is not. The only thing similar about the two is that both are incorrect statements. It's the same as saying "Not all girls are blond, but all blonds are girls." The first part of the statement is true, the second is not. To make such a statement true, it should say "Not all girls are blond, and NOT all blonds are girls."
2006-10-02 09:47:35 · answer #6 · answered by BlueManticore 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I fail to see how Yahoo An sews group violate your rights. Obviously you see something I don't. Inform me so that I might better approach this question. I think those 2 statements are similar in that they are both false.
2006-10-02 09:42:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
All pedophiles are not homosexual. Also, not all terrorists are Muslim, so your logic is faulty and statements over-generalized.
As for Yahoo, they are not compelled to give any of us a forum to speak. They pay for the forum, they choose what gets presented within it.
2006-10-02 09:38:20 · answer #8 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Welcome to the interesting nature of a private establishment. You have no first amendment right here.
In the USA, if I have a club that to join you must swear never to say, "I'm fine, you?" again in your life, and you join and I catch you saying, "I'm fine, you?" then I have every right to kick you out of my club.
Yahoo's the club. Your membership is agreement to their rule and their discression in question/answer deletion. They didn't like your question so they removed it. If you don't like it, renounce your membership.
2006-10-02 09:39:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I pity the fool who messes with your rights, Jibba Jabba!
2006-10-02 09:38:29 · answer #10 · answered by daisy 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What is your right - to ask stupid and offensive questions. Try shouting it from the street corner.
2006-10-02 11:24:36 · answer #11 · answered by P P 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋