Evolutionist, check this out....?

Question

Hi, me again, I checked out the news this morning (www.prophecyupdate.com/news), and there is now proof from scientists that the whole of Brittian and some of the surrounding areas was made by believe it or not, a great flood, they say about 400000 years ago. The bible says there was a great flood 4400 years ago that rearanged the planet. The scientists are right about the flood, but their dates are wrong (according to the bible), and there is evidence of Noahs Ark, why do they still reject the bible? In allot of ancient scriptures, like in China and South America, actualy all over the world, there is scripture talking about this great flood where only a couple pf people survived, why is it that only modern day science is rejecting the bible? Well, if the flood was true, it will put a question mark over evolution. Am I the only one that thinks satan is very hard at work trying to decieve the whole world, like the bible teaches?

Answer 1

So what? There were floods all over the place..there are actually places that are deserts now that used to be great oceans....so what! Did you also know that the people who wrote the bible thought the earth was flat so that any flood that they would have ever encountered would have been a global flood...did you also know that any evidence that people have claimed to have found about noahs ark has been faked...and its been proven fake....you should really try doing some research.

Answer 2

First of all the bible isn't a historical or scientific authority. I trust the dates offered by the scientists well before I'll trust the bible on these matters. Geological clues are very hard to dispute. On the same note as the bible as authority... it really has no ground to stand on as it is merely a self fulfilling authority. The only authority it has is derived from the book itself, it would be as if i were to say i am the king of Brittan because i said i am.

Floods are local events. It is impossible to flood the entire earth. First of all weather patterns work in concert with one another, areas of differing pressure and temperature effect each other to create localized storms. There is no way to have a world wide rain storm. Secondly there isn't enough water, even including the earths ice, to flood the entire planet.

There is no disputing that most cultures around the world, especially those that originated from near a body of water have a flood story. Floods happen several times a year, it's impossible for this to become part of mythology. When you end your argument for the validity of your worldview with "Satan is very hard at work trying to deceive the whole world" you invalidate your authority on the subject. There is no way any rational person would take you seriously if that is the way you view life.

Answer 3

"In allot of ancient scriptures, like in China and South America, actualy all over the world,"

In that case, why accept the Bible as true? Maybe the scripture to follow came out of China or South America and not the Middle East.

Second, have considered that the people doing the dating based on the Bible, that the Bible's interpretations of dates is the one that is inaccurate, and that science is merely confirming the truth of the event without confirming the dates? Or perhaps the eternal, all-powerful God was constrained by the concept of 24-hour days.

Answer 4

Actually Blargonians from Peapasqueak also predicted a great flood, about 400000 years ago. They got the date right and they were also right about the leprachauns. I wonder why you don't worship the great Peapasqueakoroni.

Answer 5

you do not no the Darwin's threoy. theEvolution through common decision, the important notion of the existence's paintings of Charles Darwin, is a conception. It's a conception approximately the beginning of version, complexity, and variety amongst Earth's residing creatures. If you're skeptical through nature, unfamiliar with the terminology of technological know-how, and ignorant of the overpowering proof, you would also be tempted to mention that it is "simply" a conception. In the identical experience, relativity as defined through Albert Einstein is "simply" a conception. The perception that Earth orbits across the solar alternatively than vice versa, furnished through Copernicus in 1543, is a conception. Continental waft is a conception. The life, constitution, and dynamics of atoms? Atomic conception. Even electrical energy is a theoretical assemble, regarding electrons, which can be tiny items of charged mass that no person has ever visible. Each of those theories is a proof that has been demonstrated to the sort of measure, through remark and test, that trained gurus receive it as reality. That's what scientists imply after they speak approximately a conception: no longer a dreamy and unreliable hypothesis, however an explanatory declaration that matches the proof. They embody such a proof hopefully however provisionally—taking it as their first-rate to be had view of fact, a minimum of till a few critically conflicting knowledge or a few bigger clarification would come alongside. .cEvolutionary conception, despite the fact that, is a little bit specific. It's the sort of dangerously uncommon and a ways-attaining view of existence that a few persons discover it unacceptable, in spite of the enormous frame of helping proof. As implemented to our possess species, Homo sapiens, it might probably look extra threatening nonetheless. Many fundamentalist Christians and extremely-orthodox Jews take alarm on the inspiration that human descent from previous primates contradicts a strict studying of the Book of Genesis. Their soreness is paralleled through Islamic creationists similar to Harun Yahya, creator of a up to date quantity titled The Evolution Deceit, who elements to the six-day production tale within the Koran as literal fact and calls the speculation of evolution "not anything however a deception imposed on us through the dominators of the arena approach." The overdue Srila Prabhupada, of the Hare Krishna motion, defined that God created "the eight,four hundred,000 species of existence from the very establishing," so as to set up a couple of degrees of reincarnation for emerging souls. Although souls ascend, the species themselves do not difference, he insisted, pushing aside "Darwin's nonsensical conception." heck this internet web page out additionally :

Answer 6

So... am I missing something here, or did that question have absolutely nothing to do with evolution? WTF? So what if there was a huge flood at some point in the past! That doesn't somehow lead to evolution being wrong! Do you even know what evolution is, or do you just attack it 'cause your pastor told you to?

Answer 7

Lets just say there was a flood. It does not prove your god. Sorry.

Answer 8

Good point Jeanne....you are very perceptive.

First, evolutionists don't accept ANY evidence UNLESS it CONFIRMS their theory of evolution.

You soon realize that when you study it for years....it is the unwritten rule of evolutionists.

No evidence is good enough if it is contrary to what they believe ...evolution is a very foolish religion.

Answer 9

Yeah there was a flood BUT IT WAS A LOCL FLOOD; THERE WAS NO GLOBAL FLOOD.

And besides EVOLUTION IS TRUE CREATION IS FAIRYTALE

Nice try dollface

Answer 10

How can you put all the animals in the world on a boat


PS http://vpoet.net/flash/youare.swf