English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-01 23:06:56 · 18 answers · asked by tysonian22 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

As a Wiccan, it is perfectly accepted, and more to the point, even if it wasn't, I would accept it anyway. Why not? They aren't harming anyone, they are just less picky!

BB
)0(

2006-10-02 08:31:15 · answer #1 · answered by Seph7 4 · 0 0

I was born to Hindu parents so that would make me a Hindu (though I'm an agnostic). Hindu literature and art is full of homosexuality and bisexuality, so I suppose it was not just practiced centuries ago, but thrived then. Today's Hindu zealots, however, do not tolerate it because of their narrow mindedness and bigotry.

2006-10-01 23:11:15 · answer #2 · answered by the_sunil 2 · 2 1

Well, first off! I'm not anti-anything but it always makes me laugh how contradictive Christians are. If Adam had been gay,where do they think that would leave them. Mankind would never have been if he would have been a shirt-tail lifter.

2006-10-01 23:46:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Who cares about religion, Christ is the only one to follow, His word proclaims it an abomination and it is a sin that will condemn you to hell like any other. Turn from wickedness and seek Him for forgiveness and you will be given victory over such temptations of the flesh.

2006-10-01 23:11:58 · answer #4 · answered by Prophecy+History=TRUTH 4 · 1 4

I believe all three sexualities are right. Heterosexuality is not necessarily normal. It's just common.

2006-10-02 05:50:18 · answer #5 · answered by LifeIsAFreeTripRoundTheSun 6 · 1 1

Here was my response to a similar thread about homosexuality that I think could apply here as well. This was the thread: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjhJIni.Wz3_AtG2umtNzPnsy6IX?qid=20061002004716AAPFNwW

And here's what I wrote:

BEING gay is not a sin. There's a difference between sexual orientation and sexual activity. A person can have a homosexual orientation but never act upon it. The issue isn't our identity but our actions. I've come to the conclusion that God intends for people with homosexual orientations to remain celibate, but that in no way means that they can't have a fully fulfilling relationship with Him. In fact, the issue isn't someone's sexual orientation, but where their focus is--are they focusing on themselves or on God, on what they want or what God wants for them? There are numerous Scripture verses that talk about chastity and self-control for heterosexuals outside of marriage, so I see absolutely nothing in Scripture that would make this not apply to heterosexuals as well. God loves gays just as He loves everyone else, but He wants them to seek Him and not themselves. I really don't think this is as complicated as we make it out to be.

2006-10-01 23:32:14 · answer #6 · answered by Pastor Chad from JesusFreak.com 6 · 1 4

My religion is all for it; however, I do worship at the church of ACDC.

2006-10-02 08:12:06 · answer #7 · answered by sarcasticquotemarks 5 · 1 0

My religion sees nothing wrong with it.

2006-10-01 23:18:42 · answer #8 · answered by Cinnamon 6 · 1 2

God made us male and female for a reason, He loves everyone but hasn't changed his mind on that.

2006-10-01 23:16:26 · answer #9 · answered by good tree 6 · 1 2

since homosexuality is an abomination, any practice of this perversion must be included.

However, the name bi-sexual is usually misapplied to the sexually promiscuous - ie. those who don't care with whom they have sex. They're just as bad as the clearly have low moral fibre and no self-discipline.

2006-10-01 23:09:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers