I like to see things from the opponent's perspective. I'm excited to see what people say when they try to look at this from the other side. My thought is non-violence in the footsteps of Ghandi and Martin Luther King Jr. What is yours?
2006-10-01 13:50:20 · 10 answers · asked by JonFugeEverybody! 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
By continuing to the last man to refuse to accept the illegal invasion of a force led by an insane dictator callede Bush.
2006-10-02 03:33:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When the Europeans were colonizing huge portions of Africa and Asia, national boundary lines were drawn which totally disregarded the ethnicity or religion of the people who already lived there. African tribes found themselves with half of their people in one country and the other half in another country.
Warring tribes were arbitrarily placed in the same country.
Some bad mistakes were made when Iraq's borders were drawn, but nobody ever considers this.
Iraq will never be peaceful until the Kurds are in one country, the Shiites in another, and the Sunnis in a third one. That way, they can have international wars if they want to, instead of a civil war which nobody wants.
2006-10-01 21:12:51 · answer #2 · answered by GreenHornet 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm still trying to figure how Bush can win the war. Now you want the Iraqi's to win, well it would be nice if somebody won and we can get the hell out of there! Wait I got it! Why don't the Iraqis tell the American people that they are fighting terrorism and invade thier own country and all we have to do is keep half a million troops there so they can establish a religious democracy. Oh I almost forgot and pay them 900 billion dollars.
2006-10-01 21:03:01 · answer #3 · answered by FreeWilly 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The kicker (IMHO of course) is that they don't want us to leave . Use your imagination,,,, what would have been the very quickest way to get US forces to go home. Every IED guarantees our presence there for at least one more day. The terrorists only goal in Iraq is to create hate, they don't care who lives or dies in the process. As long as we hate them and they hate us the terrorists are in fact winning.
2006-10-01 20:56:07 · answer #4 · answered by tom l 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Middle East has always been and always will be in a war state. Plain and simple, that is the way of the Middle East.
2006-10-02 18:01:27 · answer #5 · answered by haweesay 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes IDEALLY sitting down and having a nice little pow-wow over differences would be the correct thing to do. HOWEVER when dealing with aggressive, violent people who's goal(from their god) is to kill people not of their sway period, we'd be dead meat. Nor should we teeter about our position either but back it up 100%.
2006-10-01 22:10:25 · answer #6 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There will be no winners in this war except the merchants of death ( Lockheed etc) Iraq will be fragmented.
2006-10-02 02:10:42 · answer #7 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iraq and their restistance would not really have a chance against the the UK (oh yeah,are america there too?)Only joking America!!
2006-10-01 20:56:03 · answer #8 · answered by eddieafcb 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There are no winners with war... ONLY wanna bes!
2006-10-01 20:59:13 · answer #9 · answered by The Songwriting Hub 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No one will win. No one!!
2006-10-01 20:58:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋