I would say peace talks or follow the UN rules
2006-10-01 12:31:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
To have a good communication with other countries. In europe we call it politics. We sit down and vote for or against things and if we can transmit information building bridges via business relationships or culture exchanges, there are lot of posibilities, but to say officially that the afghanistan people should be smoked out, is maybe not the right start for a goog communication. We are in the millenium and war should not be necessary, when we have so many other common assignments to solve about environment politic and pollution. And we still need to trade. HMMMMM The US has great financial power in the world, should war be it??? its like putting moore wood on the fire.
2006-10-01 14:37:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How about reality. Man is a possesive passionate creature driven by testosterone, and will fight to the death to retain that which he considers "his". Don't matter if it's territory, women, religion, ideology, money, or family. There cannot be a world where war is nonexistant, whether it be with nuclear weapons or sticks and stones. Human nature cannot be undone without losing mankind itself. Watch unsupervised children play if you doubt that. Even the innocent are guilty!
2006-10-01 12:53:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
before each little thing, there no such component as "rap metallic". Alt metallic is only a pretend umbrella time period, and Funk metallic could no longer be interior an same sentance as nu metallic. potential metallic is it really is own seperate type. you're also lacking some subgenres (modern lack of life, Technical Thrash, modern Thrash, and others). to respond to your question the most known metallic isn't metallic in any respect, in case you bypass by skill of the mainstream. contained in the metallic community, all those are known except nu metallic, metalcore, deathcore, mathcore, and the pretend "rap metallic".
2016-11-25 21:21:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Site down and think of some. There are 100's of alternatives, not to say there all good ones thown.
sit back and let the other guy do all the work
2006-10-01 12:32:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sekkennight 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
How about diplomacy......working through the UN? wait...we did that in Iraq and we found out that Saddam was still buying weapons and he had France, Russia, AND the UN on his payroll. Let's see.....we could convert to Islam? I'm not too keen on that either. We could not retaliate when they blow up innocent people and murder thousands, because we know that only makes them madder. Any other bright ideas?
2006-10-01 12:35:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Peaceful negotiations. Talk about the problem and find a solution with harmony. Believe in positive power rather then a negative, destruction power. Get rid of Bush and Blair right now.
2006-10-01 12:34:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by dotab 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
How about a nice game of Twister and some cookies ?
2006-10-01 17:53:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Oldragon 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes...Surrender!!!!!!!
We should have surrendered to the Nazis & the Japs.
We should surrender to the terrorists.
We should allow the Muslims to poke the eyes out of any women who wear make-up.
We should allow the Muslims to cut the feet off any woman that shows her ankles.
This would bring us your kind of peace.
2006-10-01 12:34:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
There are none in this war because you do not talk to Islamo-Fascist Terrorists. To them, that is a sign of weakness and they will destroy you!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-01 13:40:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
0⤋