"I am not an evolutionist. I likewise have serious questions about some of their claims. But, it is irrelevant to me. I do not believe anything "originated" or was "created" which negates evolution and the Bible. I believe life landed here and came forth but it was not a creation, it was "seeding" from outer space."
2006-10-01 10:21:06 · 13 answers · asked by BABY 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I'd talk about UFO's and then just make stuff up about how the Egyptians must have used alien electricity to see when they were carving hieroglyphics into the pyramids because there is no soot that would be there if they had used torches.
2006-10-01 10:28:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bible: "God made the whole world & everything in it."
Many scientists will even have support for all life came on a "Comet". The water, and single cell organisms contained with in a comet could be life's own force. So, millions of years ago, a comet containing water and single cell organisms plummeted to Earth at the historical moment where the Earths atomospher, climate, and other Earth science factors allowed the acceptance of single cell life forms. These life forms then evolved.
Where would such technology to freeze & capture a evolving single cell life form come from? Certainly, we can speculate that there may be another society/ individual with such talent. Further, it is highly probable that an Omnipitant Being orchastrated all light, life forms, and evolutions (here and elsewhere in space). Being Catholic I am taught that this Omnipaitant Being is God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
Most of what I have stated here does not interfere with my Catholic Teachings ... but I'm not 100% sure of the findings of the Jesuits (& their telescopes) and how the Vatican lables the Jesuits findings. Those Jesuits are kinda going fast with this new understanding. I think our religious culture (Catholosism) still needs time to think and ponder to really hear what God's saying. Thank God that's not on my shoulders (Giggle).
2006-10-02 15:50:26 · answer #2 · answered by Giggly Giraffe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
assuming that this was my belief, i would defend it by saying,
Evolution does happen, but not how it is percieved. i believe that if we had come from apes that we would have found the link by now. therefore we dod not come from apes.
however i do not believe in creation because the idea af an invisible man in the sky that made me and all of my ancestory sounds redicilous to me. and if the Bible is the absolute truth then it would be the only religion on the planet because through meracles and the feeling of the holy ghost people would convert at first exposure, kind of like a bad virus that there is no cure for.
this leaves Aliens. we know that many people of high social stature and higher educatio have claimed to have been abducted. many more have seen a UFO. so why would they visit and not announce their presence. because we are jsut a farming project that they are studying. we were dropped here and left in a harsh enviroment just to see what would happen. and once they have all of the useful data they will likely destroy us just as many of our own science projects are burnt to keep them from getting our.
religion is simply a thing that they use to try to keep us under some form of control.
2006-10-01 17:57:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seeding from outer space would still require evolution for life to produce humans. "life...came forth" is just a misleading way of saying evolution.
If the seeding was intentionally dropped by ET's to produce humanity, that would imply creation.
The position is indefensible without adopting either creation or evolution.
2006-10-02 13:48:37 · answer #4 · answered by limendoz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry Puddin' both evolution concepts and creation conceps go back further than life on this little planet so to defend the statement against those you have to deal with day one of the existence of everything including space and time.
2006-10-01 17:26:40 · answer #5 · answered by mike g 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, this is gonna be a stretch. I'd likely just drug the person, haul em off to area 51 and experiment on them.
I suppose I could talk about how positive proof for any of the myriad theories is impossible, and my explanation is just as likely as any of the evolution based ones, or any of the religious creation based ones.
2006-10-01 17:24:00 · answer #6 · answered by But why is the rum always gone? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is irrelevant to me is the key phrase in that entire statement.
What is there to defend?
The entire universe is alive, life is eternal, life is ubiquitous throughout the universe and life as we know it appeared on the earth by some as yet unidentified process.
Everything in that statement is factually accurate or based on logical conclusions.
2006-10-01 18:45:40 · answer #7 · answered by Left the building 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is ultimately your right to believe what u want as u see fit....To each their own truth...Not believeing in the bible or evolution does not make u anyless human or inmoral....u are who u are and if your ok with that then more power to u...
2006-10-01 17:27:48 · answer #8 · answered by coopchic 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say that there is no proof God exists, I would say that everything can be decided by scientists and mathmeticians. What is the statement against this statement, if so, it would be easier to explain what I would say.
2006-10-01 17:23:53 · answer #9 · answered by baselthe2nd 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it came from someone who missed their spaceship... maybe they didn't have their Nike tennis shoes (see Marshall Applewhite for reference)
2006-10-01 17:24:07 · answer #10 · answered by more than a hat rack 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋